JoelP
|
| posted on 20/4/25 at 11:52 AM |
|
|
Do Q plate cars still not need hazards?
As the title thanks. I've got indicators but no sign of hazards working. Will it fail on that? There's no labelled switch.
|
|
|
|
|
gremlin1234
|
| posted on 20/4/25 at 12:04 PM |
|
|
no, they are tested as 1971 cars
" Vehicles having a Q plate registration when presented for MOT are to be treated as follows:
-for emission purposes only, they are to be considered as first used before 1 August 1975
-for all other testing purposes, they are to be considered as being first used on 1 January 1971"
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/mot-inspection-manual-for-private-passenger-and-light-commercial-vehicles/introduction
introduction 6 b
EDIT to add,
if fitted they should work, so perhaps re-label any switch as something else 'ejector switch' is a good option.
(I note the original poster says he has no labeled switch, just info for others reading the post in the future :-)
[Edited on 20/4/25 by gremlin1234]
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 20/4/25 at 12:52 PM |
|
|
Thanks!
Possibly just the brake light warning to sort then...
|
|
|
gremlin1234
|
| posted on 21/4/25 at 01:12 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
Thanks!
Possibly just the brake light warning to sort then...
1971 cars don't need brake warning dashboard lights.
but again if you have a low fluid light or differential pressure warning - it should work.
hey in 1971, single circuit brakes were normal, no float/level sensor, and the reservoirs were cast aluminum, so couldn't even see the level
without taking it's cap off. (and that's after you had opened the bonnet)
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 21/4/25 at 05:27 PM |
|
|
Music to my ears thanks!
|
|
|
gremlin1234
|
| posted on 21/4/25 at 06:47 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
Music to my ears thanks!
yep all fine, but, you, have to accept 'the danger'
|
|
|
