We're moving at the end of the month to a house down a steep forestry track. We're probably going to need two 4x4s and one will have to be
fairly serious for winter.
Can I please get folks' thoughts on this - eBay Item
Its local, presumably dirt cheap to insure and, well, appears pretty cheap & charming to me - vile seat covers aside!
My main concern would be the incorrect registration! I'm sure it hasn't kept enough DVLA points to retain the original 1974 V5.
Hi Tim
If you know your way around this sort of thing - I think you'd be ok with it - it's not too expensive.
I would consider Owelly's point - although the current owner doesn't seem to have any problems with insuring it - at least it's not one
trying to be passed off as tax exempt as is often the case with this sort of thing.
I had a hybrid years ago, but it was a coil converted 2a chassis - nice V8 in it
For not too much more money though, you could be into a 90Defender.
Rob
The Defender body on a Rangey chassis is a petty standard Hybrid. We built a couple and they both had enough points to satisfy the man from the
government
You'd be better off just buying an old Range Rover though, it will have all the off-road ability without the hideously cramped and uncomfortable
interior, get a manual V8 on LPG and it will cost you less to run that a TDi as well.... I just sold one for £700....
quote:
Originally posted by Wheels244
Hi Tim
If you know your way around this sort of thing - I think you'd be ok with it - it's not too expensive.
I would consider Owelly's point - although the current owner doesn't seem to have any problems with insuring it - at least it's not one trying to be passed off as tax exempt as is often the case with this sort of thing.
I had a hybrid years ago, but it was a coil converted 2a chassis - nice V8 in it
For not too much more money though, you could be into a 90Defender.
Rob
quote:
Originally posted by TimC
quote:
Originally posted by Wheels244
Hi Tim
If you know your way around this sort of thing - I think you'd be ok with it - it's not too expensive.
I would consider Owelly's point - although the current owner doesn't seem to have any problems with insuring it - at least it's not one trying to be passed off as tax exempt as is often the case with this sort of thing.
I had a hybrid years ago, but it was a coil converted 2a chassis - nice V8 in it
For not too much more money though, you could be into a 90Defender.
Rob
Ah Rob, I was hoping you'd be around to give me your view. Putting aside the registration thing for a moment, what would be the advantage of a 90 over this thing? I'm sure I've read about the 100 being ideal? I've not seen too many Landies at this price point without impending rust issues!
Callan, I take your point but the Landy body is pretty cool.
quote:
Originally posted by TimC
quote:
Originally posted by Wheels244
Hi Tim
If you know your way around this sort of thing - I think you'd be ok with it - it's not too expensive.
I would consider Owelly's point - although the current owner doesn't seem to have any problems with insuring it - at least it's not one trying to be passed off as tax exempt as is often the case with this sort of thing.
I had a hybrid years ago, but it was a coil converted 2a chassis - nice V8 in it
For not too much more money though, you could be into a 90Defender.
Rob
Ah Rob, I was hoping you'd be around to give me your view. Putting aside the registration thing for a moment, what would be the advantage of a 90 over this thing? I'm sure I've read about the 100 being ideal? I've not seen too many Landies at this price point without impending rust issues!
Callan, I take your point but the Landy body is pretty cool.
quote:
Originally posted by Doctor Derek Doctors
quote:
Originally posted by TimC
quote:
Originally posted by Wheels244
Hi Tim
If you know your way around this sort of thing - I think you'd be ok with it - it's not too expensive.
I would consider Owelly's point - although the current owner doesn't seem to have any problems with insuring it - at least it's not one trying to be passed off as tax exempt as is often the case with this sort of thing.
I had a hybrid years ago, but it was a coil converted 2a chassis - nice V8 in it
For not too much more money though, you could be into a 90Defender.
Rob
Ah Rob, I was hoping you'd be around to give me your view. Putting aside the registration thing for a moment, what would be the advantage of a 90 over this thing? I'm sure I've read about the 100 being ideal? I've not seen too many Landies at this price point without impending rust issues!
Callan, I take your point but the Landy body is pretty cool.
Well I can only let you learn the hard way...... everytime you smash you knee getting in, everytime you crack your elbow on the door when you go over a bump, every time you get cramp because you can't adjust the seat you will curse the day you didn't get a Range Rover. My first two cars were Landy's and the amount of time I finished a journey by slamming the door as I got out clutching a bashed limb while swearing at it through gritted teeth was suprisingly high.... its called "Land Rover Elbow" for a reason.
Woah! I never said I didn't love them. I loved my old Lightweight. its just that I soon came to apppreciate that while it looked cool a Range
Rover or Disco was just as good (usually better) off-road and offered a level of comfort that was acceptable to someone born anytime after the 12th
century AD
We stopped building Hybrids like the one in the Ad' because we realised that we were just making something worse than the standard Range Rovers
we were starting with. Bobtails, thats the answer!
I would avoid HYBRID landrovers unless it is original part from an engine change.. .... Fist impressions - BINGER!
Just looks wrong. If it's 100 Inch then how did he get a 90" body to fit ? if it has a ranger tover chassis and is 1974 then why is
it registered as a DEFENDER which only star production in Early 80's
If police check that on a motorway and get VOSA involved you be in for trouble.....
Should have been SVA'd IVA'd unless you can prove it was built before the SVA and then it would have been sorted in the ammnesty....!
Guess BUYER BEWARE!
Thats a series 3 Windscreen wiper set up as well (middle to centre wipe is S2 and S3, not 90/110 which is parrallel wipe). Hence I would suspect a S3
bulkhead, ie OLD (pre 1983), and therefore possibly another rust issue.
The Dash is definately S3. The only thing there thats a 90/110 could be just the wings or perhaps just only the plastic eyebrows.
Its got Sliding windows on the doors which is a S2/3, and not a 90/110/defender, as they had wind up windows all except for a very very few 1983
110's (pre-facelift model), Army windows are sliding, but have sloping glass not a straight vertical split like this one)
I would say some of this is a Series body on a rangey chasis, and the bloke has it shown as a Defender under the TYPE in the Advert, hence IMHO
misrepresented. Namely its a S3 bulkhead, S3 doors to start with. It could be a cut down 110 rear tub and front wnings and bonnet. I cant tell from
the pictures.
It looks a real Bitza. However, that is not usually a major issue for a Landy.
Bear in mind that some insurance companies will not like it. You will need to make a full declaration, or you could end up uninsured. Namely its all
OK, until you have an accident and a sharp eyed insurance assessor spots its not standard, and that would not be hard to do. Leaving you with no
vehicle and no or a reduced payout.
National Farmers Union were very good for a Landy insurance when I had mine. But mine was a std one.
A 1974 chassis will have tinworm somewhere. Check thoroughly, I take a thin screwdriver and test with that... watchout as a lot of owners dont like
that sort of testing!
I would also check the chassis and engine numbers, against the VIN plate, and especially against the V5.
A TDi300 is a nice engine, the R380 gearbox is the best one to have. Expect 26mpg as an average. I have yet to meet a diesel landy that does 30mpg, as
an average. Possibly on a run at 50mpg. They have the aerodynamics of a brick.
I would not buy that vehicle without a very close and detailed inspection by someone who really knows both Landies and Rangeys in depth.
ie someone who strips and builds them, not someone who just drives them.
Done a Vehicle check on the reg to see what its says?
IHMO its a Range Rover Van or Truck, or Van with Windows. Thats what I would expect to see on the V5.
I would bet that the V5 still says just plain Range Rover.
Just be very careful on this one. It could be good... But I would want ALL the paperwork completely straight / correct and in order before I parted
with any money.
Just my 2d's worth.
EDIT:
Oh dear, just saw this in the questions...
" though off the top of my head it's registered as a 109 Land Rover,"
If its a Landy reg with a rangey chassis its an automatic Q plate.
ie the chassis has been replaced with a non identical chassis, and its almost guaranteed to be secondhand chassis.
Thus a secondhand chassis on a vehicle is an Automatic Q plate.
Li
nky
Rangey Registration AND Rangey Chassis, should be OK, if done correctly. Landy Registration and a Rangey Chassis, is a BIG CAN OF WORMS!
At this point I would just walk away!
[Edited on 18/8/2012 by wilkingj]
Thanks Gents. I can't help wondering if the non-original chassis would really make any material difference to the safety and/or structural
integrity of a vehicle like this but I suppose rules is rules.
Hmm.
quote:
Originally posted by TimC
Thanks Gents. I can't help wondering if the non-original chassis would really make any material difference to the safety and/or structural integrity of a vehicle like this but I suppose rules is rules.
Hmm.
Cheers. Not that it should necessarily make a difference, but the 'bloke' appears to be a young student/graduate who answers to Susie.
[Edited on 18/8/12 by TimC]
This is one of the REALLY dodgy ones
Land Rover Series 2/Defender 3.5 V8 Hybrid Tax Exempt | eBay
Not much left of the 1966 vehicle on this one
Could you live with this if the mods have not been done properly......
Landrvoer man myself , but I sold my hybrid for spares after this story....>!
This doesn't look as though it was made in 1968 either !!
land rover 88' defender tax exempt 90 hybrid galvanised chassis red | eBay
That's a series rear crossmember, I would steer clear of that
The only difference between a landrover not getting stuck in mud and a range rover/discovery being stuck is tyres.
The problem with range rover/discoveries is rust, not so much chassis rust as body rust on mounting points hence plenty of hybrids out there, some are
mine !
If I was buying a car for this money to use then a late classic range rover is a good bet, high levels of comfort just shove some aggresive tyres on
for the winter.
Regards Mark
[Edited on 18/8/12 by mark chandler]
quote:
Originally posted by mad4x4
Could you live with this if the mods have not been done properly......
Landrvoer man myself , but I sold my hybrid for spares after this story....>!
quote:
Originally posted by Wheels244
This doesn't look as though it was made in 1968 either !!
land rover 88' defender tax exempt 90 hybrid galvanised chassis red | eBay
If you want a cheap landy try and early freelander with then old L series diesel. As long as its got the transmission in 1 piece and youask the right people for advice it will do everything you need. With the right yres on they are good off roaders, but will still reurn good mpg on road and a lot easier and less tiering to drive than a disco or defneder.
Went to see the Landy today with a guy who really knows his onions. Its not for me.
Liked:
300 Tdi engine - plenty of power, ran well although a bit of blue smoke on over-run
R380 gearbox was really really sweet - very car like
Range chassis seemed to be highly competent in general
Disliked:
Leaking brakes (x2)
Leaking power steering
Horrendous wiring
Loose a frame
Needs a total rebuild really
Ho-hum.
There's always this French Blue Niva
http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/lada/niva/lada-niva-4x4-1-7-lhd-2005/334280
quote:
Originally posted by TimC
There's always this French Blue Niva
http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/lada/niva/lada-niva-4x4-1-7-lhd-2005/334280
I got an email from the Landy Advert.
They say the V5 shows it as a Land Rover 109.
I would say this should be on a Q plate under the radically altered vehicle rules from DVLA. (and should have had a SVA / IVA, depending on when it
was converted)
It could turn into an administrative nightmare if it comes to light with the authorities, let alone the insurance company.
With a Secondhand chassis, off a different vehicle (Range Rover), and retaining the reg off the Landrover, it could become a major problem.
If it were me, I would not buy it.
quote:
Originally posted by MK9R
If you want a cheap landy try and early freelander with then old L series diesel. As long as its got the transmission in 1 piece and youask the right people for advice it will do everything you need. With the right yres on they are good off roaders, but will still reurn good mpg on road and a lot easier and less tiering to drive than a disco or defneder.
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Hignett
quote:
Originally posted by MK9R
If you want a cheap landy try and early freelander with then old L series diesel. As long as its got the transmission in 1 piece and youask the right people for advice it will do everything you need. With the right yres on they are good off roaders, but will still reurn good mpg on road and a lot easier and less tiering to drive than a disco or defneder.
+1
I love the TD4 Freelander that I bought for Milenah, Tim.
Going to do an Off-Road day in it next Sunday!!!
The Freelander may still follow but this was just up the road, tidy enough and I couldn't resist:
eBay Item
Great stuff Tim.
I've had a couple of Series 3's - one 2.25 petrol like yours and a V8.
I loved them both.
If you want to make it a bit more refined suspension wise - fit parabolic springs - makes a big difference on and off road.
Also if you want to give it more legs on the road - fit range rover/Disco diffs.
Does it have an overdrive fitted ? They make a big difference too.
Cheers
Rob
quote:
Originally posted by Wheels244
Great stuff Tim.
I've had a couple of Series 3's - one 2.25 petrol like yours and a V8.
I loved them both.
If you want to make it a bit more refined suspension wise - fit parabolic springs - makes a big difference on and off road.
Also if you want to give it more legs on the road - fit range rover/Disco diffs.
Does it have an overdrive fitted ? They make a big difference too.
Cheers
Rob
quote:
Originally posted by TimC
Hi Rob,
It's all reasonably standard/original I think. I'm looking forward to it gently evolving into something more usable than ever,
Cheers,
Tim
quote:
Originally posted by Peteff
First thing to evolve would be the engine Tim, you will be horrified by the fuel consumption of the 2.25 petrol. 12mpg is good and it doesn't make much difference how you drive them.
Hi Steve,
Essentially the plans are as follows:
1. Get it to the stage where everything works and it's usable. It needs a fresh MOT very shortly and there are some niggles - I did 150ish
miles in it yesterday and the speedo stopped working and the manifold-to-downpipe joint rattled itself loose - now that got noisy! I've also
managed to thrust a screwdriver through the chassis on the offside so that will need welding - the chassis is a bit of a patchwork already. Hopefully
it will then drag us out of the forestry track to the house in even the worst weather and get us to work/the shops this winter. It'll also be
pressed into action to tow the Gemini to a few race circuits.
2. Once the race car build is finished I'll then turn my attention to the Landy. Ideally I'd like to make it my daily driver. This will
involve a total rebuild with a new chassis and bulkhead. The engine is TBC but might be a 2.5 petrol on LPG or a 200di conversion. Diff changes
and/or overdrive will obviously be needed too, as would parabolic springs. Trigger's Broom? Maybe but its a big kit car really so why not have
it how I want it?
Having driven "Edwin" (Kate always names our cars; Edwin follows Norris, Big Jeff and Wendy) a little bit now, I can foresee a time when I
could happily live with it as a daily driver - I'm fairly hardy when it comes to motoring. Yes, it could do with going a bit faster with a few
less revs on the (non-existent) dial and would benefit from a little bit of sound deadening but its okay and keeps things interesting at least. It
was only a relatively short while ago when I was commuting an hour each way in a B-reg 1.2 Nova with no stereo - and its really not much worse than
that for comfort and ride quality.
TC
[Edited on 16/9/12 by TimC]