thepest
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 01:31 PM |
|
|
Another Megajolt Question
For ignition tuning why do we need map or TPS? I am just finishing my MJ and before I fit the TPS to the carb is there any reason for doing so? In
Most performance cars on carb they do away with vacum iginition advance, its just on RPM, could I do the same on the MJ?
|
|
|
|
|
DarrenW
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 01:36 PM |
|
|
Your engine will run fine on 2D (ie without TPS or MAP fitted). This is what i have at the moment as i havent worked out how to fit the TPS to my bike
carbs reliably.
Fitting the load position sensor allows the timing to be adjusted so you can fine tune the car better according to throttle position - something a std
dizzy cannot do. In theory this should allow you to get smoother running, probs optimise power and i guess also improve economy depending on how you
are driving.
|
|
|
mcerd1
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 01:45 PM |
|
|
what he said ^^^
the MAP sensor is the beter way to achive this, but its hard to make it work well on multiple carbs (fine for a single carb)
this is why most mod'd dizzys ditch the vacum advance
a TPS isn't the best way to measure engine load, but it works and its simple and easy to fit
do a search - there are loads of old threads on this subject
[Edited on 17/6/08 by mcerd1]
|
|
|
02GF74
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 02:05 PM |
|
|
my understanding was that vacuum advance is for better fuel ecomnomy and that distributors for tuned engine lose the v.a. because these engines are
fitted with twin sdie draught carbs with separate inlets so vacuum would be taken frm 1 cylinder instead of an average for the whole engine.
TPS is a workable compromise,
|
|
|
timex
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 05:24 PM |
|
|
In do believe that a TPS can give a more resonsive throttle over a map sensore tho. This is due to the fact that it works directly of throttle
movment. 
|
|
|
MkIndy7
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 05:38 PM |
|
|
The TPS doesn't give any indication of load tho.
At 1,500 rpm on the flat 90% throttle might be full load, whereas at 1,500rpm going up a hill 40% throttle might be full load... its hard to explain
but MAP is much better to use and easier to tune.
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 05:40 PM |
|
|
so, am i right in thinking, if i just don't connect the MAP or TPS sensor, even if the MJ is built for either, my engine will run fine? thats
good  i can't think of a proper way to connect the TPS yet. would be nice if i didn't have to fit it
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
MkIndy7
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 06:21 PM |
|
|
Yes it would work but you'd loose the major benefit of having it.
I'd try my hardest to get the MAP sencor to work, and if not resort to the TPS.
There's a few mixed responces as to weather you can get a twin carb setup (if thats what your using) to give a suitable MAP reading, we've
used it on Twin 40's by combieing 4 takeoffs into a common chamber but that hasn't worked for the R1 ITB's that were currently
using.
|
|
|
paulf
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 06:29 PM |
|
|
I have gsxr 600 throttle bodys and am using a MAP sensor megajolt for the ignition.I joined all the take offs and put a mig nozzle in line to act as a
restrictor then a small vacuum canister and it works ok, it also supplys the vac sifgnal for the megasquirt controlling the fuelling.
I think MAP gives the best indication of load and the megasquirt needs a stable signal for the fuelling also, unless using alpha n. so worth the time
to get it working correctly.
Paul.
quote:
Originally posted by MkIndy7
Yes it would work but you'd loose the major benefit of having it.
I'd try my hardest to get the MAP sencor to work, and if not resort to the TPS.
There's a few mixed responces as to weather you can get a twin carb setup (if thats what your using) to give a suitable MAP reading, we've
used it on Twin 40's by combieing 4 takeoffs into a common chamber but that hasn't worked for the R1 ITB's that were currently
using.
|
|
|
thepest
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 09:06 PM |
|
|
thanks for the posts guys, well I am stuck wit/h a TPS megajolt so I cannot do much about map.
Just one other thing thou before I try firing up tomorrow, I am running a x-flow so the firing order is 1-2-4-3, I connect one coil to the 1 and the 4
and the other to the 2 and the 3 correct?
|
|
|
David Jenkins
|
| posted on 17/6/08 at 09:19 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by thepest
Just one other thing thou before I try firing up tomorrow, I am running a x-flow so the firing order is 1-2-4-3, I connect one coil to the 1 and the 4
and the other to the 2 and the 3 correct?
If your coil is the same as mine, the posts are numbered - just connect 1 to 1, 2 to 2, and so on. As you say, one side feeds plugs 1 and 4, the
other feeds 2 and 3.
|
|
|
mcerd1
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 08:26 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
i can't think of a proper way to connect the TPS yet. would be nice if i didn't have to fit it
does this give you any ideas ??
http://www.cate1.co.uk/megajolt/installation.php
if not take some pics and see if anyone here can come up with a plan 
|
|
|
thepest
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 11:02 AM |
|
|
Got it running, and first time too, started bang on as soon as I engaged the starter.
Are there any items I could use to tidy up the wiring? Other than cable ties onto the chassis?
|
|
|
DarrenW
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 11:16 AM |
|
|
Well done that man - good result.
i used split conduit for tidying up wiring. best bit about the split stuff is when you realise you have more wires to add later its easier to tidy
them up.
Best place ive found for split conduit is IKEA. They supply a bag full for tidying up TV wires etc - approx £5 from memory. Other than that Newark
this weekend will be good place to get some.
You could also use self amalgamating tape. Dont use insulating tape - it softens and unravels itself over time. SVA dont like it either.
|
|
|
martyn_16v
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 04:51 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
so, am i right in thinking, if i just don't connect the MAP or TPS sensor, even if the MJ is built for either, my engine will run
fine?
That depends on your idea of 'fine'. If it means 'anywhere near as well as it could' then no, it's not fine by a long
shot. If it means 'it hasn't blown up yet', then yes, it'll probably be fine. Maybe 
Running more ignition advance at light loads makes a huge difference to how responsive the engine feels, much more than adjusting the fuelling does.
It'll make a very appreciable difference to how economical you can get the fuelling in this area as well.
'Performance' carbs often ran without using a vac advance because a race car that's at full throttle virtually all the time
doesn't need one. If you plan to spend any time at part throttle however you really should have some kind of load dependant advance.
|
|
|
thepest
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 06:38 PM |
|
|
Thanks Darren, I got some spit tubing, now how to I get it to hold to the chassis other than cableties?
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 07:38 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by MkIndy7
The TPS doesn't give any indication of load tho.
Not by itself, but in conjunction with engine RPM it does, and of course MJ measures both.
|
|
|
MkIndy7
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 08:49 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by MkIndy7
The TPS doesn't give any indication of load tho.
Not by itself, but in conjunction with engine RPM it does, and of course MJ measures both.
Well it doesn't give a true indication of load as the effective WOT (wide open throttle) changes.
When given in MAP terms its simply when it reads atmospheric pressure, thats when the engine is pulling its hardest or when your asking the most of
it.
But when using the TPS atmospheric pressure (true WOT) might be at 10% throttle at 1,000rpm but as high as 50% throttle at 4,000 rpm so it makes
mapping un-nesacerily harder if MAP is available.
I suppose i'm more used to using it in a Megasquirt situation where the fueling is an important factor as well, and given the choice for either
setup i'd rather use MAP.
|
|
|
DarrenW
|
| posted on 18/6/08 at 09:22 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by thepest
Thanks Darren, I got some spit tubing, now how to I get it to hold to the chassis other than cableties?
I cable tied mine. You may be able to get oversized p-clips but i was happy with ties.
|
|
|
thepest
|
| posted on 19/6/08 at 06:05 AM |
|
|
One more on the TPS, everyone seems to put it on the carb on throttle body, can I put it on the accelerator pedal? should read the same as on the
throttle butterfly
|
|
|
DarrenW
|
| posted on 19/6/08 at 07:33 AM |
|
|
Yes you can. Within the megajolt software you can calibrate the fully closed and fully open position so the sensor can be mounted on either carb or
pedal.
If mounted on pedal im not sure if you have to be careful about any slack in the cable at fully closed position. Its poss you could get some small
rotation of the sensor before the throttle starts to open. You can get around this when you calibrate by pushing the pedal a bit until cable tightens
but throttle remains closed then note the reading on the screen.
|
|
|
thepest
|
| posted on 19/6/08 at 11:06 AM |
|
|
Great, thanks, installation is finished for now and I added a basic 2D map. As for the trigger wheel, I was thinking of bolting it into the pulley, at
the moment it is holding on 2 spiggots one on the side of the pulley and the other on the side of the Bolt/washer, I have only got it running in the
garage so far. Would the torque of the bolt hold the trigger wheel on the spiggots or would it move?
Photos:
 
VR sensor and trigger wheel 1
 
VR sensor and trigger wheel 2
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 19/6/08 at 11:48 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by thepest
One more on the TPS, everyone seems to put it on the carb on throttle body, can I put it on the accelerator pedal? should read the same as on the
throttle butterfly
I certainly wouldn't do this if you were using it for fuelling, but just for ignition advance it might be adequate.
|
|
|
David Jenkins
|
| posted on 19/6/08 at 11:55 AM |
|
|
What carb are you using on the x-flow?
If it's a Weber DGV (or DGAV) down-draft then maybe you could copy what I did...
Old thread linky
My web page has further details...
Even if it isn't one of those carbs, it might give some ideas...
[Edited on 19/6/08 by David Jenkins]
|
|
|
thepest
|
| posted on 20/6/08 at 06:28 AM |
|
|
Thanks to all for your posts. Couple more things if anyone is still reading this thread...
Should I need to fuse the EDIS and the Megajolt? On the same fuse or separate?
Other than mapping are there any BHP gains over a distributor type system?
|
|
|
.jpg)
