Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Prop Catcher
Daddylonglegs

posted on 20/4/11 at 07:23 AM Reply With Quote
Prop Catcher

I'm in the process of fabricating a prop catcher for the Locost. Having looked at several on here, I've decided to go with the style here.

The only thing is, I'm running a live axle so there will be a reasonable amount of up/down movement of the prop. What should I leave as a gap to allow travel?

The last thing I want to do is cause the prop to wear at the catcher and have 2 small prop shafts flailing around in the tunnel

Thanks.

JB





It looks like the Midget is winning at the moment......

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
designer

posted on 20/4/11 at 07:45 AM Reply With Quote
Usually it is the UJ at the engine end of the prop that fails and the catcher should be within six inches of that.

Keep it simple. Why not just mount a bar across the lower members?

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
daviep

posted on 20/4/11 at 07:48 AM Reply With Quote
You need to jack up the back and let the axle go to full droop and then take off the springs and lift the axle into full bump. I would leave 10mm clearance in droop and 25mm clearance in bump to allow for the bump stop compressing.

Regards
Davie





“A truly great library contains something in it to offend everyone.”

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
mcerd1

posted on 20/4/11 at 07:50 AM Reply With Quote
edit - davie beat me too it ^^

if you make them like that there should be no way that it can touch unless the prop breaks



[Edited on 20/4/2011 by mcerd1]





-

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Daddylonglegs

posted on 20/4/11 at 07:54 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by designer
Usually it is the UJ at the engine end of the prop that fails and the catcher should be within six inches of that.

Keep it simple. Why not just mount a bar across the lower members?


I think the theory is that the closer to the prop you can 'catch it' the less chance it has of building momentum and wreaking havoc! I've seent he result of what these things can do and it's scary

Cheers Davie, I'll be doing just that this evening

Edit: BTW, I've asked D&F if they can supply the bolts for the diff flange, but if they can't, does anyone know where I can get them? The mounting holes seem to be around 7.5mm-so I'm guessing 5/16?)

Also, I am going to thread lock them, but is it better to wirelock?

[Edited on 20/4/11 by Daddylonglegs]





It looks like the Midget is winning at the moment......

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
macc man

posted on 20/4/11 at 10:40 AM Reply With Quote
I would say that prop catchers are more suited to IRS installations that have very little prop movement. Best just to fit a diagonal bar to the central chassis where your legs are. Unless the prop is restrained to a very small degree I dont think it would do much good.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
snapper

posted on 20/4/11 at 10:58 AM Reply With Quote
If in doubt then steel plates either side welded to the tunnel bars will stop it coming into the cockpit.
It's a road car and your not a professional racer so the extra weight and safety is worth it IMHO





I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
FASTdan

posted on 20/4/11 at 01:33 PM Reply With Quote
I was thinking something along the lines of this (2-off to make a full circle obviously).....

Description
Description


6mm MS plate. The only mode of failure would be buckling, will run a quick FEA to establish the force needed to buckle this but I suspect it would be far greater than the force required to shear the fasteners.

Possible future product depending what price I can do them at?





NEW danST WEBSITE NOW LIVE! Bike carbs, throttle bodies and more......

http://www.danstengineering.co.uk/

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
designer

posted on 20/4/11 at 02:54 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

6mm MS plate



That's overkill, aluminium that thickness would do.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
FASTdan

posted on 20/4/11 at 03:33 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by designer
quote:

6mm MS plate



That's overkill, aluminium that thickness would do.


Yeah I had considered that and I suspect you are right. Its a pretty rigid structure and the FEA indicates its massively overkill.

Weight wise in 6mm MS its 800g per pair of plates, as compared to 300 in alu.





NEW danST WEBSITE NOW LIVE! Bike carbs, throttle bodies and more......

http://www.danstengineering.co.uk/

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.