Board logo

Remote Filler Cap? Radiator too low.
dhutch - 14/6/13 at 02:14 PM

I'm currently working on the cooling system of a project.

The project currently uses a vented radiator cap and recovery bottle but due various constants we cant get enough slope on the top hose to allow air to be purged from the engine. Hence I was wondering on the possibility of a remove filler cap above the radiator with a bleed line from the engine to the cap, with then a pipe down to the recovery bottle.

Has anyone used a system like this, or know of a suitable setup.

The filler cap would then either T into the top hose with a non-venting cap on the radiator, or be run from the radiator up to the cap.



Daniel


britishtrident - 14/6/13 at 03:03 PM

I take it the top of engine is higher than the rad.


First stage is drill either small vent bleed holes in the thermostat (either two 2mm to 2.5mm or a single 3mm hole) as this will make filling and bleeding much easier and allow the thermostat to respond faster.

If you have a a copper/brass rad off a 1970s/1980s British car you may find the overflow fitting on the radiator filler neck is not soldered in but a nylon or black plastic push fitting that wasn't intended to seal very well under pressure or vacuum. If this is the case connecting on to this won't work.

To blank off the existing pressure cap just insert solid rubber washer ( ie a rubber disk) between the existing washer and the cap.

You can get fittings for radiator pressure caps that fit directly into the top hose (Car Builders Solutions sell them) but it would be a more satisfactory solution to fit a header tank. The Rover 25 tank is a popular choice because it is small and easy to mount. It has two hoses the bottom one goes to the bottom hose the top goes to the top outlet of the engine --- if the vent holes in thermostat ensure it will bleed properly even with thermostat closed.


renetom - 14/6/13 at 04:24 PM

Hi
This is what we did on ours
But its a bike engine, should work on a car engine.
Good luck
René

Waterworks R1 Indy
Waterworks R1 Indy


Scuzzle - 14/6/13 at 06:39 PM

This is what I used on mine, I had to re-weld the outlet pipe though as mine was a little loose and it leaked, hopefully just a one off though.

http://www.nfauto.co.uk/in_line_radiator_filler_neck.htm


T66 - 14/6/13 at 07:19 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Scuzzle
This is what I used on mine, I had to re-weld the outlet pipe though as mine was a little loose and it leaked, hopefully just a one off though.

http://www.nfauto.co.uk/in_line_radiator_filler_neck.htm



So is the outlet still used or sealed up ?


Scuzzle - 14/6/13 at 07:40 PM

I sealed mine up because I don't need it but it could have been used if I wanted, I think I just got a ropey one and was just unlucky, easy enough fix just running round it with the welder.

[IMG]http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j106/scuzzlebutt-1/P1010011-4.jpg[ /IMG]

I could just use the expansion bottle to fill my cooling system but this does make life easier.

[Edited on 14/6/13 by Scuzzle]

[Edited on 14/6/13 by Scuzzle]


T66 - 15/6/13 at 07:36 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Scuzzle
I sealed mine up because I don't need it but it could have been used if I wanted, I think I just got a ropey one and was just unlucky, easy enough fix just running round it with the welder.

[IMG]http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j106/scuzzlebutt-1/P1010011-4.jpg[ /IMG]

I could just use the expansion bottle to fill my cooling system but this does make life easier.

[Edited on 14/6/13 by Scuzzle]

[Edited on 14/6/13 by Scuzzle]




I like your EWP siting with the cap above for bleeding, looks neat, consider it copied...

My radiator is fairly low, but its fed either side by 32mm truflex pipes which route down each sill to the engine. However they rise up from floor level and enter the bonnet area under the scuttle, and then drop back down to the rad, if that makes sense.

So both sides are good for air locks.


dhutch - 16/6/13 at 06:38 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Scuzzle
This is what I used on mine...

http://www.nfauto.co.uk/in_line_radiator_filler_neck.htm


Yea, I has seen them. I was proposing something more like this, only with a pressure cap:



Low hose goes down onto the top of radiator, upper hose goes over to the engine, and the a tube down to the recovery bottle, the advantage being that its smaller than a pressurised header tank, which would have to be significantly bigger then a Rover25 sized tank given the size of the cooling loop. Its a 4l diesel, with large radiator.


Daniel


britishtrident - 16/6/13 at 08:05 AM

It might be better to keep it simple and avoid expense and complication

The problem with recovery bottles is small ones don't really work, the ones (Honda and other Japanese) that do work rely in the radiator header tank having sufficient air space.

Pressurised expansion tanks are now pretty well universal they only require a connection to the highest point on system and a connection to the cold side of the system ie water pump inlet/bottom hose/bottom of radiator. You can also get away with only one connection on a pressurised expansion tank but the coolant in the tank accumulates gunge and if you have coolant flowing through the bottle it makes topping up with antifreeze coolant easier.


dhutch - 19/6/13 at 08:32 AM

Yes, although the system hats being adapted is based on a proven design that uses a radiator with pressure cap and recovery bottle system. I should perhaps have mentioned that as they are less common these days.


Valtra - 19/6/13 at 09:37 PM

I put a plain cap on the rad and made a "t" piece to fit in the top hose using a brass rad neck from Europa and a large copper plumbing "T" with the solder beads included which act as perfect barbs for the hose. It is a perfect size for my hose diameter and works an absolute treat as well as looking OEM once painted .