mangogrooveworkshop
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 02:22 PM |
|
|
Do you think this could do with a Busa conversion
Chassis #01 original locost type
car
That would really please the cats not!
Would need seatbelts upgaded
[Edited on 25-4-07 by mangogrooveworkshop]
|
|
|
worX
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 02:26 PM |
|
|
is that STILL on there???
Steve
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 02:43 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by worX
is that STILL on there???
Steve
what do you mean STILL? at that price you could get 4 indi's that would run rings round it. What a crappy little engine, rather have a pinto.
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
mangogrooveworkshop
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 02:51 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by worX
is that STILL on there???
Steve
Its been around the block a few times.
Should rather sell it through the Goodwood sales.
|
|
chockymonster
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 03:25 PM |
|
|
Ah, but it has heritage don't you know!
PLEASE NOTE - Responses on Forum Threads may contain Sarcasm and may not be suitable for the hard of Thinking.
|
|
02GF74
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 03:36 PM |
|
|
look at this other items, 131 in total but 0 feedback!?!?!?!
that has been on before peoblby along with a lot of other stuff yet nothing seems to have been sold. (or does you feedback not accumulate if you are
a motor delaer?)
makes you wonder......
|
|
Coose
|
posted on 25/4/07 at 08:28 PM |
|
|
It sounds like a plan to me! Have a look at this: -
Mark
It's a 1960 S2 Lotus also, though with a smaller engine than the one on eSkip. If I said it was 919cc could you guess what it was?
Well, it was 919. Then it dropped a rod shortly after that pic was taken!
A new motor should be in it soon though!
p.s. It doesn't need seatbelts at that age....
[Edited on 25/4/07 by Coose]
Spin 'er off Well...
|
|
trogdor
|
posted on 26/4/07 at 02:24 PM |
|
|
yeah my dads 1962 austin sprite doesn't have seatbelt either, there used to be a roll bar to hold on to, but he has got rid of that now too.
|
|
Guinness
|
posted on 26/4/07 at 02:36 PM |
|
|
Is this the rod in question?
whoops
Mike
|
|