macspeedy
|
 posted on 6/11/09 at 02:04 PM |
|
|
Westminster Bridge pic
In the morning these shadows point towards the Houses of Parliament
 
Description
enjoy 
|
|
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 02:06 PM |
|
|
ha ha brilliant
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
clairetoo
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 02:07 PM |
|
|
I've seen this on another forum and the general opinion was that it was photoshop'd 
Its cuz I is blond , innit
Claire xx
Will weld for food......
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 02:14 PM |
|
|
i don't know, i found another picture somewhere that was of the HP. with the edge of the bridge in view, and you could see them, but pointing
the other way. must have been taken in the afternoon.
of course now i can't find the picture
[Edited on 6/11/09 by blakep82]
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 02:16 PM |
|
|
if you search westminster bridge shadows on google images theres loads
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
D Beddows
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 02:18 PM |
|
|
lol, so photoshop'd - there is no way you'd get that shadow from what is effectively 3 circles
|
|
|
Liam
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 03:19 PM |
|
|
Not shopped!
It's not just a 2D cutout of 3 intersecting circles - there is significant thickness to the feature. The straight sides of the, er, phallus
(hee hee) are cast by the straight edges (in the thickness direction) of the 'corners' where the top circle intersects the bottom two
circles. Hope that explanation makes some sense. Been there, seen it, analysed it  All you need is a bright low sun not too far from
perpendicular to the bridge.
I said phallus - huh huh huh
|
|
|
roadrunner
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 03:26 PM |
|
|
As Liam says, it's the thickness of the circles that give the erm straight lines.
|
|
|
jimgiblett
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 03:45 PM |
|
|
I am up in town just around the corner on Tuesday if the sun is out I'll get a pic.
- Jim
|
|
|
D Beddows
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 04:28 PM |
|
|
'It's not just a 2D cutout of 3 intersecting circles - there is significant thickness to the feature. The straight sides of the, er,
phallus (hee hee) are cast by the straight edges (in the thickness direction) of the 'corners' where the top circle intersects the bottom
two circles. Hope that explanation makes some sense. Been there, seen it, analysed it All you need is a bright low sun not too far from perpendicular
to the bridge. '
actually..... fair enough - that makes sense looking at the picture again!
|
|
|
Macbeast
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 05:46 PM |
|
|
Can we assume the designers cocked it up ?
I'm addicted to brake fluid, but I can stop anytime.
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 6/11/09 at 11:05 PM |
|
|
These look real, but I'm pretty certain the ones above have been
"enhanced" somewhat.
|
|
|
