Board logo

Maths problem
Slater - 22/1/19 at 09:01 AM

Help....... I used to be good at maths, but my daughter has stumped me with this one:

x = 0.436 (with the 3 and 6 being recurring)

Prove algebraically that x can be written as 24/55


I might post some others.....working through them right now.


tegwin - 22/1/19 at 09:09 AM

24 divided by 55 equals 0.43636363 which equals x therefore x equals 24/55?


russbost - 22/1/19 at 09:48 AM

Tegwin, I don't think that counts as an "algebraic proof"


Slater - 22/1/19 at 09:49 AM

Surely it can't be as simple as that, I think there needs to be some algebra in there somehow.

What a strange question.....


liam.mccaffrey - 22/1/19 at 09:57 AM

let x=0.436 recurring
multiply both side by 10 gives
10x= 4.36 recurring

multiply both side by 1000 gives
1000x= 436.36 recurring

therefore (1000x - 10x) = 436.36r -4.36r (this gets rid of the recurring decimal)

This gives

990x = 436-4

990x = 432

rearranging gives

x = 432/990
simplifies to

x= 24/55


wylliezx9r - 22/1/19 at 10:07 AM

24/55=0.436=x

24=0.436*55=55X

24= 23.98 = 55x

23.98/24 = 55X/24

23.98/4 CANCELS DOWN TO 1 (OR WOULD OF IF I HAD A PROPER CALCULATOR WITH RECURRING FUNCTION)

LEAVING 55X/24

REARANGED X =24/55



[Edited on 22/1/19 by wylliezx9r]


Slater - 22/1/19 at 10:48 AM

Nice, you boys are cleverer than you look. I think Liams' solution is right, I would not have come up with that.

What a great forum this is. Thanks both.


rusty nuts - 22/1/19 at 11:37 AM

If you had asked this question 50 years ago I would have worked it out in my head.

What was the question?


nick205 - 22/1/19 at 11:55 AM

I have similar difficulties helping my kids with their maths homework.

I didn't find maths difficult at school, but age has bitten and my brain power isn't what it used to be.


Mr Whippy - 22/1/19 at 12:20 PM

the answer is 42


liam.mccaffrey - 22/1/19 at 01:31 PM

How old is your daughter, that problem is far too difficult for GCSE. A-level maybe.


Angel Acevedo - 22/1/19 at 03:21 PM

quote:
Originally posted by rusty nuts
If you had asked this question 50 years ago I would have worked it out in my head.

What was the question?


No wonder there´s "rusty" on your forum name...
50 years ago I´d have mumbled "gu-gu-da-da"


wylliezx9r - 22/1/19 at 03:43 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Slater
Nice, you boys are cleverer than you look. I think Liams' solution is right, I would not have come up with that.

What a great forum this is. Thanks both.


I think you'll find both solutions are correct but just done in different ways. I haven't been able to show all the working with my method - it's very difficult to show the cross cancellation and re-arrangement but its very basic algebra probably A-level.


SteveWalker - 22/1/19 at 04:00 PM

quote:
Originally posted by nick205
I have similar difficulties helping my kids with their maths homework.

I didn't find maths difficult at school, but age has bitten and my brain power isn't what it used to be.


I can still do the maths they do today - once I can figure out the meaning of the question. So many terms and methods seem to have changed names.


02GF74 - 22/1/19 at 04:55 PM

quote:
Originally posted by wylliezx9r
quote:
Originally posted by Slater
Nice, you boys are cleverer than you look. I think Liams' solution is right, I would not have come up with that.

What a great forum this is. Thanks both.


I think you'll find both solutions are correct but just done in different ways. I haven't been able to show all the working with my method - it's very difficult to show the cross cancellation and re-arrangement but its very basic algebra probably A-level.


Sorry but no. , Liam subtraction gets rid of the recurring sequence, whereas yours would only work if you had a calculator that can represent decimals to an infinite number of places, which don't exist.


steve m - 22/1/19 at 07:00 PM

Im with Mr Whippy,

42


Andybarbet - 22/1/19 at 08:04 PM

42 Spot on :-)


Slater - 22/1/19 at 08:40 PM

Hi, daughter is 15, doing GCSE Maths level 1. I took Maths O level age 15 and somehow got an A, but that question stumped me.

She says a big thank you to Liam, and that Mr Whippy must be a fool.

Obviously too young for HHGTTG.


liam.mccaffrey - 22/1/19 at 09:54 PM

I knew that maths degree would come in handy........one day


nick205 - 23/1/19 at 09:27 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Angel Acevedo
quote:
Originally posted by rusty nuts
If you had asked this question 50 years ago I would have worked it out in my head.

What was the question?


No wonder there´s "rusty" on your forum name...
50 years ago I´d have mumbled "gu-gu-da-da"




50 years ago I don't think I was even a thought in my parents heads (I'm the oldest of 3 children by the way)


Mr Whippy - 23/1/19 at 12:29 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Slater
Help....... I used to be good at maths, but my daughter has stumped me with this one:

x = 0.436 (with the 3 and 6 being recurring)

Prove algebraically that x can be written as 24/55


I might post some others.....working through them right now.


anyway why are you doing her home work? tell her to do it herself the cheater

I've probably forgot 99% of the maths I got at school, makes not difference tbh, I have excel here to do it for me or google if I get stuck

I'm just waiting for the micro chip they stick in your head that gives you access to the internet just by the power of thought

Then I'll be


JoelP - 29/10/24 at 11:47 AM

Was just helping my lad revise for his gcse, and recurring numbers came up, and I actually remembered this thread from 6 years ago! Crazy. Didn't help me solve it to be honest though. I did my maths gcse when I was 11, and I swear these things didn't come up.


Rod Ends - 29/10/24 at 12:55 PM

With the prompt:

x = 0.436 (with the 3 and 6 being recurring)

Prove algebraically that x can be written as 24/55

ChatGPT gives:

To prove that x = 0.4363636... (where the digits 3 and 6 repeat can be written as 24/55 algebraically, let’s set up the problem and solve it step-by-step.

1. Let x = 0.4363636...

2. Since the repeating part is "36," we’ll separate this into two parts: the non-repeating "4" and the repeating "36."

3. Let x = 0.4 + 0.0363636...

4. Now let y = 0.0363636... , which is the repeating decimal part.

Then, we can write x = 0.4 + y

5. To express y as a fraction, set y = 0.0363636...

6. Multiply y by 100 (since "36" has two digits:

100y = 3.6363636...

7. Now, subtract y = 0.0363636... from 100y = 3.6363636... to eliminate the repeating decimal:

100y - y = 3.6363636... - 0.0363636...

99y = 3.6

8. Solve for y :

y = 3.6/99 = 36/990 = 4/110 = 2/55

9. Substitute y = 2/55 back into x = 0.4 + y :

x = 0.4 + 2/55

10. Rewrite 0.4 as a fraction:

0.4 = 4/10 = 22/55

11. Therefore:

x = 22/55 + 2/55 = 24/55

So, we have shown algebraically that: x = 24/55

[Edited on 29/10/24 by Rod Ends]

[Edited on 29/10/24 by Rod Ends]


David Jenkins - 30/10/24 at 01:58 PM

I see questions like this and think... "I wonder what's on the TV".


Rod Ends - 30/10/24 at 03:38 PM

[img] OU maths
OU maths
[/img]