jambojeef
|
| posted on 23/4/08 at 09:52 PM |
|
|
Odd Chassis
So dreaming on the fluke-motorsport website again and I find a link to this on the "Kit Car trader" website.
Anyone seen anything like this?!
Geoff.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
nitram38
|
| posted on 23/4/08 at 09:55 PM |
|
|
Looks a bit weak in the middle............
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 23/4/08 at 09:56 PM |
|
|
there must be something missing there! It would fold in two! 
|
|
|
mangogrooveworkshop
|
| posted on 23/4/08 at 10:08 PM |
|
|
That was for sale on ebay a little time back......for loadsof dosh.
Some thing about building it for a customer and he didnt pay the ten grand or something
|
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
| posted on 23/4/08 at 10:16 PM |
|
|
lame, loads of faults in that 'design'
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
|
jollygreengiant
|
| posted on 23/4/08 at 11:03 PM |
|
|
The upper suspension pick point to chassis section (s) made me wince straight away.
Beware of the Goldfish in the tulip mines. The ONLY defence against them is smoking peanut butter sandwiches.
|
|
|
RK
|
| posted on 24/4/08 at 01:03 AM |
|
|
Where are Fred and Barney?
|
|
|
britishtrident
|
| posted on 24/4/08 at 07:14 AM |
|
|
Spring mountings will flex something awful.
[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]
|
|
|
02GF74
|
| posted on 24/4/08 at 08:02 AM |
|
|
horizontal radiator
|
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
| posted on 24/4/08 at 09:30 AM |
|
|
as a bare minimal, no wonder the customer refused to take it
 
Rescued attachment crap chassis fix.JPG
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
|
DarrenW
|
| posted on 24/4/08 at 09:35 AM |
|
|
My initial thought was thiose wheels looked very similar to whats on Mk's new chassis - but closer look the tyres are defo different.
Mmmm - does look odd, but once its braced up as per whippys post it then looks too heavy. I wonder what body was planned?
|
|
|
iank
|
| posted on 24/4/08 at 09:56 AM |
|
|
Must have had a hole in the bonnet and associated ducting if the horizontal rad was going to have air sucked through it. So I'm guessing full
body. Doors intended probably as otherwise there's no reason for the sides to be that weak.
Wonder what engine was intended. Doesn't look like enough room for a longitudinal mid. Transverse mid? Looks to heavy for a BEC.
--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous
|
|
|
