Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: OT seat post stress anaylisis
02GF74

posted on 18/11/08 at 09:32 AM Reply With Quote
OT seat post stress anaylisis

Any one have access to one of these stress anaylisis packages to do a quick anaylsis? (sorry its in here as AE does not allow attachments)

I would like to see the stresses on the seat post of a mountain bike and to find out how long the post must continue insdie the seat tube. Aslo and if drilling holes in the seat post furthest from where it enters the tube has an effect on the strength.

I guess I am gonna have to supply dimensions, materials, riders weight etc taht I don't have at hand.

Ta. Rescued attachment sp.JPG
Rescued attachment sp.JPG







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dinosaurjuice

posted on 18/11/08 at 09:39 AM Reply With Quote
all seat posts are marked with a 'minimum' line when they leave factory. usually based on rider weighing 16 stone. some fancy carbon posts have a weight limit though.

as a general rule for aluminum posts, always have at least 100mm inside the frame.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 09:41 AM Reply With Quote
use a carbon tube rather than cutting holes in it, as if it snaps it will be very painful and you will be in the papers as some weirdo who has sex with a bike





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
balidey

posted on 18/11/08 at 09:58 AM Reply With Quote
I have cosmos express and in theory I 'could' do it as the software is more than capable of it, but as I have said many times before on here, using FEA to get a result and using FEA correctly to get the correct result are two very different things. Its really a job left to someone that is fully trained and uses FEA all day everyday.

So I would be wary of anyone offering to do it.

Also (again I'm sure I've mentioned on here before) you must remember what FEA is for. It is NOT to get a result that you use. You must back it up with testing. Anyone that knows anything about FEA knows this. All FEA is, is a tool to help you reduce the number of tests you do. ie you could have 20 seat posts with different hole sizes and patterns. FEA will tell you which 15 to disregard and then you can test the other 5. Then you compare the results with what the FEA predicted on those 5.

Hope I haven't put a dampener on things. But my company has subbed out lots of FEA work and some of the results are no where near what we calculated in house. Some of the test results were close, some weren't.

The hardest part about doing FEA is knowing when to not do it, know your own limitations.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:01 AM Reply With Quote
^ very sensible





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:03 AM Reply With Quote
^^^ I hear you.

I'd still be interested to see the stresses though.

Let's make it simpler; a post with 10 mm, 20, 40, 80 mm insertion into the seat tube. A rider weight of 100 kg






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Syd Bridge

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:16 AM Reply With Quote
Do you know of Joe Higgins? He's well known in mountain bike circles and specialises in this stuff, and did his M.Eng with my eldest. Now working for a bike co. in Switzerland I think.

FEA will show you the max stress at the post/tube interface/break line, but not much else. Simple bending and shear calcs will give you an accurate figure, without having to resort to FEA, which is as put by Balidey. Just a helpful tool, but not ultimately definitive.

Cheers,
Syd.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:21 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
^^^ I hear you.

I'd still be interested to see the stresses though.

Let's make it simpler; a post with 10 mm, 20, 40, 80 mm insertion into the seat tube. A rider weight of 100 kg


Prob I see is unless you are on a road bike that has no pot holes you are not going to be able to predict the shock loads the post will see. On such a critical part I'd never dream of taking it anywhere near the limits that it might fail for the sake of what? A few minuscule grams saved. IMO not even close to being worth looking at and at best just plain dangerous.

If the bike seems to be at the limits…have you considered butt liposuction or shaving your hair? Finger nails serve no purpose for cycling and weigh a few grams as does your teeth, they are very heavy (especially if you have lead fillings) and just obstruct airfow when breathing harming performance. Simply get them removed and see your times improve




[Edited on 18/11/08 by Mr Whippy]





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:33 AM Reply With Quote
Also consider the fact that the seat post is not a perfect fit with the frame's seat tube. i.e. the post is pinch bolt clamped where it enters the seat tube and inevitably there will be some flex at that point. The end of the seat post will move slightly within the seat tube causing further stress and shock loading.

Not sure what you're considering, but IMHO you shouldn't be modifying a manufactured part which "should" have been designed and tested to work within acceptable saftey limits in it's intended use.

USE, Easton and many others produce some fairly trick carbon and alloy seat posts which weigh very little.

BTW - do you still have that Whyte MTB lurking in the garage. I've alsways been fascinated by the front suspension design.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
balidey

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:33 AM Reply With Quote
Done it, the answer is 39.9


http://s204.photobucket.com/albums/bb270/balidey/?action=view&current=POST.jpg

Just to show you how quick and easy it is to 'do FEA' and because of this it is considered to be easy to do. But obviously its all b011ocks. I know that, but someone with out self restraint could easily have done similar and told you a different answer.

Does look pretty though when you get the nice blues, yellows and reds.

And thats another misconception. Red is NOT areas of failure.

[Edited on 18/11/08 by balidey]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:37 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by balidey
Done it, the answer is 39.9


http://s204.photobucket.com/albums/bb270/balidey/?action=view&current=POST.jpg

Just to show you how quick and easy it is do 'do FEA' and because of this it is considered to be easy to do. But obviously its all b011ocks. I know that, but someone with out self restraint could easily have done similar and told you a different answer.

Does look pretty though when you get the nice blues, yellows and reds.

And thats another misconception. Red is NOT areas of failure.

[Edited on 18/11/08 by balidey]


go and stick some holes in it want to see more red





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
balidey

posted on 18/11/08 at 10:42 AM Reply With Quote
What am I, your FEA biatch?



Sorry, not much red around the hole (sure thats a punchline to a joke )

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 11:02 AM Reply With Quote


wonder how much weight did that saved?





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
balidey

posted on 18/11/08 at 11:05 AM Reply With Quote
On my model with 2mm wall thickness (no idea what it should be) in plain carbon steel (again, no idea if thats correct) with a 12mm hole (again.... ditto) then it saved about 5 grammes.

Its probably better to have a nice big poo before you go riding. Not that I've ever weighed my own poo before

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 11:40 AM Reply With Quote
the wind has much more effect, its quite fierce really. I get up to around 40mph on mine and it feels like I’m going though treacle the winds so strong and I was considering that a recumbent bike would show the greatest efficiency, especially if a wind defector like this was fitted – not sure if I’d feel happy on such a strange machine though as I’m use to normal frames?







Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 18/11/08 at 01:38 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Whippy
the wind has much more effect, its quite fierce really. I get up to around 40mph on mine and it feels like I’m going though treacle the winds so strong and I was considering that a recumbent bike would show the greatest efficiency, especially if a wind defector like this was fitted – not sure if I’d feel happy on such a strange machine though as I’m use to normal frames?





FWD too, now that might take some getting used to on a pedal bike!






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 18/11/08 at 01:48 PM Reply With Quote
might explain his expression

this looks a bit more normal but should still be good at cutting through the wind


[Edited on 18/11/08 by Mr Whippy]





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
balidey

posted on 18/11/08 at 02:24 PM Reply With Quote
MEB
Man Engined Bike ?

Also, 02GF74, what are you trying to achieve, are the holes for adding lightness? Or for mounting something ?

[Edited on 18/11/08 by balidey]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 20/11/08 at 12:19 PM Reply With Quote
I've had two seatposts snap and not surprisingly is is always at the point where they leave the seat tube, the red area in the diagrams.

Posts do have the minimum insertion mark but I was wondering what effect does the amount of post within the tube have as far as it snapping.

Not having a post nearby, it is someting like 100 mm; I cannot see the end ofthe post (furthest away from the clamp) contributing a lot so drilling a few holes in the sides of it should not compromise it.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.