The Doc
|
posted on 3/7/06 at 03:38 PM |
|
|
Rear Lights
Hi,
I'm uncertain about what constitutes a legitimate rear light cluster. Someone suggested there is a radius issue here. Is that correct? I have
some Lucas light clusters which are mareked E11 but with very angular edges.
I also have a pair of rounded clusters with no Emarkings at all. Which (if any) would be best to use?
Rescued attachment MVC-002E.JPG
|
|
|
nick205
|
posted on 3/7/06 at 03:40 PM |
|
|
top ones I'd say, the E marking is a must and the edges look OK on them.
|
|
Peteff
|
posted on 3/7/06 at 06:16 PM |
|
|
the E marking is a must
Not as long as it complies to the standard, You'll need a reflector with those as there doesn't seem to be one in there.
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|