Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Charlies engagment photo
mangogrooveworkshop

posted on 23/2/05 at 08:20 PM Reply With Quote
Charlies engagment photo









View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ned

posted on 24/2/05 at 10:09 AM Reply With Quote
charles & camilla
charles & camilla






beware, I've got yellow skin

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
200mph

posted on 24/2/05 at 10:49 AM Reply With Quote
was that one woof for yes??


cheers
Mark

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 24/2/05 at 11:39 AM Reply With Quote
What do you say to that Camilla Rescued attachment ahorsey.jpg
Rescued attachment ahorsey.jpg






yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
locogeoff

posted on 24/2/05 at 01:04 PM Reply With Quote
Hey What gives!

O.K. she's not exactly Diana, but why do we all rip the pi55 out of her?, at least she's not a publicity seeking tart! Chances are she's not going to take Dick from every Tom and Harry so maybee he'll be happy.

Being an ugly barsteward myself I feel I have to defend the cosmetically challenged, does that make me a hypocrit

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
clbarclay

posted on 24/2/05 at 02:02 PM Reply With Quote
Who cares, she may be queen but only as long as charles is king so apart from appere by his side (rather than 2 steps behind) what difference will she make?

The only (and very important) of the monarchy is to give tabloids something to talk about other which celeb is up the duff again.
I mean hundreds of people dressed as nazis go to sing a long sound of music every year, and do we care NO.

Mind you if tabloids where not constantly harasing royals for storys what would the purpose of the royal family be?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 24/2/05 at 02:30 PM Reply With Quote
Lighten up.

Man alive, while we're taking the p!ss out of her we're leaving someone else alone .
what would the purpose of the royal family be.? You tell me, since they stopped being a part of the governing body they don't have a purpose any more.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DarrenW

posted on 24/2/05 at 03:13 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Peteff
Man alive, while we're taking the p!ss out of her we're leaving someone else alone .
what would the purpose of the royal family be.? You tell me, since they stopped being a part of the governing body they don't have a purpose any more.


Maybe they are a EU tax fiddle??? The government can declare them as an expense and claim tax relief from the EU, or worse still for all we know Bush might be another Andy Hunter - he might claim 25% of the countries profits as protection money. Keeping the Royal family may be a stealthy way of keeping the cash in the UK. Perhaps they are actually doing us a favour.......






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
locogeoff

posted on 24/2/05 at 04:16 PM Reply With Quote
O.K. Lightening up

TWAAF
TWAAF

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 24/2/05 at 04:22 PM Reply With Quote
Keeping the Royal family may be a stealthy way of keeping the cash in the UK

They can put it in my account for a while instead of Maj's if they want. 2 or 3 weeks interest on it would keep me for the rest of mu natural I reckon.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
clbarclay

posted on 25/2/05 at 03:43 PM Reply With Quote
The purpose of the royal family is like the question

If a tree falls in the forest and there is nobody there to hear it, does it make a sound.

Its the sort of question that has no true answer.


All the same i'm game for royal miky taking, just think theres usually better things to laugh at. Usually the current goverment, the oppositon or both at the same time.

[Edited on 25/2/05 by clbarclay]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
chunkielad

posted on 25/2/05 at 03:46 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by clbarclay
The purpose of the royal family is like the question


Tourism finances a lot of things - Americans in particular spend a fortune in London whilst seeing the palace/tower etc..
They seem to love castles too!!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
clbarclay

posted on 25/2/05 at 03:51 PM Reply With Quote
Ah the upstart democracies/dictatorships (not sure which) that dream that they too might also have an empire one day.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
carcentric

posted on 26/2/05 at 12:01 AM Reply With Quote
Whatcha mean?!

We got umpires . . . lots of 'em, stripey shirts and all!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
clbarclay

posted on 26/2/05 at 12:41 PM Reply With Quote
Umpires in striped shirts, thats not right.

A propper umpire wears several layers of dirty white (they call it cream colour) and stand in the middle of the ground with one finger raised at the batsman.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.