MK-R1
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 01:58 AM |
|
|
How big !!!!!!!
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=29750&item=2476428827&rd=1
|
|
|
|
|
sgraber
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 04:11 AM |
|
|
That is amazing.
Steve Graber
http://www.grabercars.com/
"Quickness through lightness"
|
|
|
TPG
|
 posted on 29/4/04 at 08:25 AM |
|
|
I have a 7.5 ltr Caddy engine & TH400 box sat doing nowt.....Now the others on the road........Hmmmmm..
..Which was nice..
|
|
|
mangogrooveworkshop
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 08:31 AM |
|
|
cool if you name is dum farmer sorry typo tom farmer from kwick fit and fall off
|
|
|
kingr
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 11:30 AM |
|
|
400BHP out of 8.5 litres doesn't sound too great to me. I'm sure there's some dax cossies out there with more power (although
probably less torque, but what do you expect with an engine a quarter of the size). Seems rather overly heavy too. Certainly wouldn't be my
choice, but given that I'm building a BEC, that's not really a suprise.
Kingr
|
|
|
scotlad
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 01:22 PM |
|
|
Mad!
|
|
|
macspeedy
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 05:06 PM |
|
|
as
|
|
|
dave1888
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 06:02 PM |
|
|
Remember size doesn't matter it's what you do with it that counts
|
|
|
Browser
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 07:29 PM |
|
|
Errr, OK, can't see the point mind you but there we go eh! As mentioned further up, 400bhp isn't a lot from 8.5l but he probably
doesn't need a transmission! It is also definitely a pre-SVA-mobile, no way on Gods earth that intake scoop'd pass
|
|
|
F1 Mini
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 10:29 PM |
|
|
You Can't beat a Good Chevy 7.0L Small block 649 bhp
 
Rescued attachment DSCF0018.JPG
|
|
|
sgraber
|
| posted on 29/4/04 at 10:37 PM |
|
|
HOW BIG!!!?
I'd say that image is bigger than the output of your engine! Please resize those big boyz before posting!
Everyone always badmouths the SBC pushrod lump as being so antiquated.
But man, it can still put down some power! And it's pretty compact too. And simple. And there are a lot of aftermarket parts.
Steve Graber
http://www.grabercars.com/
"Quickness through lightness"
|
|
|
F1 Mini
|
| posted on 30/4/04 at 08:46 AM |
|
|
what's the best way to resize a photo ?
|
|
|
flak monkey
|
| posted on 30/4/04 at 12:27 PM |
|
|
Photoshop 
Sera
http://www.motosera.com
|
|
|
mad4x4
|
| posted on 30/4/04 at 03:08 PM |
|
|
Stand further a way - The further away you stand the smaller the image becomes.
Scot's do it better in Kilts.
MK INDY's Don't Self Centre Regardless of MK Setting !
|
|
|
macspeedy
|
| posted on 30/4/04 at 04:55 PM |
|
|
without packages, use word save as html and extract files from folder created..
|
|
|
sgraber
|
| posted on 30/4/04 at 05:17 PM |
|
|
resizing images: I use Photoshop CS, but less expensive - I would look at PaintShop Pro. http://www.jasc.com . Very good and inexpensive software.
Steve
Steve Graber
http://www.grabercars.com/
"Quickness through lightness"
|
|
|
Tblue
|
| posted on 30/4/04 at 10:32 PM |
|
|
Back on track, that steering wheel is of a size inversely proportional to the engine.
And as for the car itself, isn't it missing the point of a Seven entirely?
|
|
|
mackie
|
| posted on 1/5/04 at 01:55 AM |
|
|
Nowt wrong with a good ol pushrod V8.
I think our 3.5 is a bit more sane in both power, capacity and weight.
I can't see how that much grunt is usable in what it still a pretty light car.
Still, it's better than putting a bike engine in a Cobra replica!!
|
|
|
kingr
|
| posted on 1/5/04 at 05:06 PM |
|
|
What's up with the roll bar on that? It seems to be about 6 inches high and leaning back.
Kingr
|
|
|
macspeedy
|
| posted on 9/5/04 at 08:18 PM |
|
|
suprised i'm not
|
|
|
greggors84
|
| posted on 10/5/04 at 12:07 AM |
|
|
To resize an image open it in paintbrush and go to select all, then image and stretch/skew, then resize it to, say 50%. It might be abit grainy but im
sure its ok for posting on here, and paintbrush comes with windows!
Chris
The Magnificent 7!
|
|
|
