Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Rose joint to replace transit drag link
CosKev3

posted on 27/12/15 at 03:13 PM Reply With Quote
Rose joint to replace transit drag link

Found a bit of info on the above after a search,but quite old threads.

Thinking of making my new wishbones to use a rose joint rather than the current transit drag link.

Will a good quality 1/2 UNF male rose joint be strong enough?

The rose joint will be screwed into a camber adjuster to allow in situ adjusting.

My plan is to weld a bolt into the mushroom,then use a rose joint with misalignment spacers,a safety washer and a nylock nut.

After Googling it I see MNR use a similar set up,anyone had failures etc using a rose joint in this position?

Cheers

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coozer

posted on 27/12/15 at 04:15 PM Reply With Quote
The Midlana uses a spherical bearing in this location. Its fixed as in sitting in the cup welded to the wishbone which is fully adjustable via rose joints at the chassis end and an adjustable turnbuckle at the rear.

Any reason why you don't like the transit drag link?





1972 V8 Jago

1980 Z750

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/12/15 at 04:20 PM Reply With Quote
Ok cheers.
The only reason I've looked into it is due to the size of the in situ camber adjusters required for the transit drag links,they look massive.
The ones I'm using for the top bones on the rear with a 1/2UNF rose joint would look loads better on the front.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 27/12/15 at 06:09 PM Reply With Quote
1/2" unf shank in single sheer + bending ......... would not be my choice.

A!so you won't find a rose joint with along enough shank to allow using a camber adjuster sleeve.

[Edited on 27/12/15 by britishtrident]





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Doctor Derek Doctors

posted on 27/12/15 at 06:27 PM Reply With Quote
There are loads of cars using a 1/2" UNF rod end on the top front outer wishbone joint. I believe its standard on Westfield sprint car and have seen loads of big power westies on slicks running this set-up in Motorsport so its perfectly up to the job.

[Edited on 27/12/15 by Doctor Derek Doctors]





Designer and Supplier of the T89 Designs - Single Seater Locost. Build you own Single Seater Racecar for ~£5k.

Plans and Drawings available, U2U or e-mail for details.

Available Now: The Sports Racer Add-On pack, Build a full bodied Sports Racer for Trackdays, Sprints and Racing.



www.t89.co.uk
www.racecarwings.co.uk

callan@t89.co.uk

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/12/15 at 07:00 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
1/2" unf shank in single sheer + bending ......... would not be my choice.

A!so you won't find a rose joint with along enough shank to allow using a camber adjuster sleeve.

[Edited on 27/12/15 by britishtrident]


Ah right thanks for your input.

is that just your opinion on the length or is there a minimum length the thread should be screwed in by?

Because currently on my Mac1 built wishbones my front transit drag links have 13mm of thread inside the wishbone,and the top adjuster on the rear wishbone is into the wishbone by 20mm.
The new rear top wishbone with in situ camber adjuster fitted the rose joint is into the adjuster by 25mm,this is the minimum it will be in by as it will increase once the camber is set up.
All of the above don't include the thread inside lock nuts.

I have seen a manufacturer built top rear wishbone using a rose joint that only used a nut welded into the end of the wishbone for the rose joint to screw into!

So my in situ adjuster will have at least double the thread length inside it compared to that.


quote:
Originally posted by Doctor Derek Doctors
There are loads of cars using a 1/2" UNF rod end on the top front outer wishbone joint. I believe its standard on Westfield sprint car and have seen loads of big power westies on slicks running this set-up in Motorsport so its perfectly up to the job.

[Edited on 27/12/15 by Doctor Derek Doctors]


Ok thanks that's great.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/12/15 at 07:06 PM Reply With Quote
Description
Description


That pic is the current top rear adjuster,20mm inside the wishbone.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
garyt

posted on 27/12/15 at 07:07 PM Reply With Quote
as your making a new wishbone , you have the rose joint and adjuster, screw it all the way in and subtract from your known one thus extending your new wish bone, out wards maximising the supported thread. Provided you haven't already dismantled your old one , you already have a known starting point in chassis pickup to upright length. hope that makes sense





remember we are not mad just creatively insane !!!!!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
phelpsa

posted on 27/12/15 at 07:10 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
1/2" unf shank in single sheer + bending ......... would not be my choice.

A!so you won't find a rose joint with along enough shank to allow using a camber adjuster sleeve.

[Edited on 27/12/15 by britishtrident]


I disagree with both of these statements.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/12/15 at 07:11 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by garyt
as your making a new wishbone , you have the rose joint and adjuster, screw it all the way in and subtract from your known one thus extending your new wish bone, out wards maximising the supported thread. Provided you haven't already dismantled your old one , you already have a known starting point in chassis pickup to upright length. hope that makes sense


Cheers that's basically what I've done,but you need to leave some thread for adjusting the camber!

[Edited on 27/12/15 by CosKev3]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
hizzi

posted on 27/12/15 at 09:07 PM Reply With Quote
mcgill motorsports do all the different rose joints, they also sell weld in threaded bushes to go with them and dust covers, very good to deal with
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 27/12/15 at 09:14 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by hizzi
mcgill motorsports do all the different rose joints, they also sell weld in threaded bushes to go with them and dust covers, very good to deal with


Yeah cheers that's who I've used so far for my rear rose joints.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 27/12/15 at 10:46 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CosKev3

I have seen a manufacturer built top rear wishbone using a rose joint that only used a nut welded into the end of the wishbone for the rose joint to screw into!


Certain kit car manufacturers have produced some horrifically bad examples of engineering in the past. I have seen nuts welded onto the end of tubes, and I have also seen them fail. Just because a kit car manufacturer does something, you can't assume it's a well engineered solution (though clearly some manufacturers have a far better track record than others).

[Edited on 27/12/15 by MikeRJ]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
CosKev3

posted on 28/12/15 at 12:59 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by CosKev3

I have seen a manufacturer built top rear wishbone using a rose joint that only used a nut welded into the end of the wishbone for the rose joint to screw into!


Certain kit car manufacturers have produced some horrifically bad examples of engineering in the past. I have seen nuts welded onto the end of tubes, and I have also seen them fail. Just because a kit car manufacturer does something, you can't assume it's a well engineered solution (though clearly some manufacturers have a far better track record than others).

[Edited on 27/12/15 by MikeRJ]


Yeah I totally agree,no way would I consider using such a small thread length into a wishbone!

just giving an example of what is in use on some cars.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.