Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Bumps stops...
dhutch

posted on 20/9/09 at 10:09 PM Reply With Quote
Bumps stops...

The way the rear of the westfeild is currently the firs thing to bottom out is the diff input flange against the chassis rail which is clearly not clever, and maybe even why the diff now whines.

I now have new rear dampers (protech's) which a big diffrence to the likely hood of it bottoming out compaired to the old dampers which where basicaly empty, however its on my mind as something to sort.

There shocks have rubber doughnuts as bump stops but these dont come into plat soon enough. Merlin do c-shaped shims to go on the shaft, but is there any reason i cant just get a block of nylon and turn it down to about the same shape of the rubber doughnut and of the right thickness that i can add it onto the shaft to give me the right spacing?



Daniel

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 20/9/09 at 10:21 PM Reply With Quote
I dropped some landrover shock bushes on mine as the wheel just kissed the arch.

link

at 19p each they do not break the bank.

Regards Mark Rescued attachment shock.jpeg
Rescued attachment shock.jpeg

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
snapper

posted on 20/9/09 at 10:22 PM Reply With Quote
Live axle?
Shocks wont stop it bottoming out but stronger springs will.

Years ago the German low rider look meant that bump stops were more important than springs, but only to protect the rest of the car from being battered to death by the suspension.

You need more suspension travel or stronger springs.
Nothing worse than hitting the bump stops in a 7 cause by then it will only bounce or slide





I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ReMan

posted on 21/9/09 at 03:47 AM Reply With Quote
Yes, bump stops should not be considered part of the normal suspension operation. Purley there to avoid damage in emergencys/landings over hump back bridges
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Staple balls

posted on 21/9/09 at 04:06 AM Reply With Quote
I'd've thought harder springs, or rising rate springs would be the way to do it. (though I'm probably wrong)

Bump stops should be there to stop metal on metal contact.

[Edited on 21/9/09 by Staple balls]






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
procomp

posted on 21/9/09 at 06:50 AM Reply With Quote
Hi

No need to alter spring rate or add extra bump stops. There is a problem either with the ride height or the size of the input flange if thats what is making contact. On the Westfield liveaxle setup only the smallest input flange is to be used. The other two larger sizes will give problems. What is the ride height with driver onboard under the chassis where the rear chassis brackets are ?.

Cheers Matt






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 21/9/09 at 07:46 AM Reply With Quote
With no springs fitted the bump stops should be big enough just stop the wheels fouling the arches or any part of car touching the ground. ---- and of course your propshaft making metal to metal contact with the chassis.

They should also stop the suspension travel before the coils of the springs run out of travel.

As Mark Chandler already suggested Landrover rubber bushes are a cheap easy effective answer although damper manufacturers will also sell you puka rubbers for the job.





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dhutch

posted on 21/9/09 at 09:24 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ReManYes, bump stops should not be considered part of the normal suspension operation. Purley there to avoid damage in emergencys/landings over hump back bridges
Yes clearly, thats what im aiming for.

quote:
Originally posted by britishtridentWith no springs fitted the bump stops should be big enough just stop the wheels fouling the arches or any part of car touching the ground. ---- and of course your propshaft making metal to metal contact with the chassis.
Yes exactly, which is what they dont quite do now.

The OP was written lateish last night so maybe its not as clear as it should be. When i bought the car it had very worn dampers which meant you had to be very careful on undulating roads and humped bridges and just in general. The car now has a pair of protechs, from procomp, on the rear which are with the spring rate suggested my matt is spot on and which works very well.

Since i fitted the new shocks ive not had any problems with the car trying to hit the bumpstops or bottom out. But as the geometry and shock length is still similar to what it is, if i removed the springs, i still find that the first thing to hit is the diff. By which time the chassis is on the floor and the wheels mm from the arches.

This is a live axled car, yes. (westfeild se with english)

I dont need much more becuase its almost at the rubber bush supplied with the protech's , but i just need another 10-15mm or so. Which as per the enquiry, i was wondering if i could make from a small block of nylon turned up on the lathe. Or even just drilled out of a 10mm sheet with a hole saw. Rather than buy expensive c-spacers or add more rubber bushes. (although i expect the landrover part is fairly hard sure rubber?)


Daniel

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.