procomp
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 07:26 AM |
|
|
Hi
Pure and simply measure one up accurately. Anyone who has done so will know exactly what i am talking about. Why exactly do yo think there are so many
people out there having to chop brackets of and make new wishbones just to get alignment.
Cheers Matt
PS it was not a slagging of Mk. Merely an attempt to help you identify that you could well be heading into more troubles with the geometry if not also
taking the position of the lower wishbone into acount also.
[Edited on 16/4/09 by procomp]
|
|
|
mr henderson
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 07:42 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by procomp
it was not a slagging of Mk.
I'm glad you cleared that up, but I am sure you can see how I got that impression, because it certainly read that way.
John
|
|
wozsher
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 08:00 AM |
|
|
Lets not get into a slanging match here, just wanted to know if other owners had experienced the problems that Matt was describing.
Cheers Woz
|
NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
|
procomp
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 08:38 AM |
|
|
Hi
No John i do not see how you got that impression. Those comments come from setting up and modifying many MK indy chassis to have geometry to enable
them to drive as they should. where as your comments came from ?.
Cheers Matt
[Edited on 16/4/09 by procomp]
|
|
mr henderson
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 12:26 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by procomp
Hi
No John i do not see how you got that impression. Those comments come from setting up and modifying many MK indy chassis to have geometry to enable
them to drive as they should. where as your comments came from ?.
So we are back to the old "I believe it to be true, therefore it's OK for me to say it on a public forum, even though I am a competing
manufacturer" defence?
The problem is the impression your remarks leave.
As for where my comments come from? well, that would be from having worked on a couple of them, and more particularly from the knowledge that a very
large number of happy MK owners are out there, driving their cars and enjoying them despite all these faults that you are making them aware of.
John
|
|
procomp
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 02:44 PM |
|
|
Hi
I really do give up with this lot. There i was thinking this topic was about someone trying to make a product to help Mk owners gain better geometry
from there indy's. John if you have no relevant help on the subject why do you bother getting involved.
I shall leave the playground for john to play in.
wozsher if you would like any other info just contact me on U2U.
Cheers Matt
|
|
mr henderson
|
posted on 16/4/09 at 05:33 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by procomp
Hi
I really do give up with this lot. There i was thinking this topic was about someone trying to make a product to help Mk owners gain better geometry
from there indy's. John if you have no relevant help on the subject why do you bother getting involved.
I shall leave the playground for john to play in.
wozsher if you would like any other info just contact me on U2U.
Cheers Matt
I'm speaking on behalf of those MK owners who, although I'm sure they will be interested in an improvement to their cars, do not want to
hear them rubbished by a competing manufacturer.
I daresay everything you say is literally true, but that doesn't mean that it is alright to say it in the way that you do. I tried to explain
this to you before.
As soon as I read BMW publishing details of faults they have found with the Ford Mondeo (for instance) then it will be OK for you to do the same with
the MK Indy. Until then, it won't be.
Hope that makes my position clearer.
John
|
|