Board logo

Front indicators, opinion please
tomgregory2000 - 27/10/08 at 04:11 PM

Am i right in thinking that if my indicators stick out as far as they do in the picture nothing gets checked for radius in the suspension area or have i got it all wrong?


indicator
indicator
[/img]

many thanks
Tommy


Mr Whippy - 27/10/08 at 04:16 PM

depends I supose on the shape of the cone, would have thought it's ok

saying that, some of the indicators edges look quite sharp

[Edited on 27/10/08 by Mr Whippy]


tomgregory2000 - 27/10/08 at 04:25 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Mr Whippy

saying that, some of the indicators edges look quite sharp

[Edited on 27/10/08 by Mr Whippy]


the indicators are rather rounded, the picture aint the best(camera phone) and the big bit with the sharp edge is quite soft rubber so shouldnt be a problem i hope


Mr Whippy - 27/10/08 at 04:28 PM

ok looks fine

sightly concerened with how high the front wings are mounted going by that bracket their outside the picture!


Johneturbo - 27/10/08 at 04:28 PM

Question is, would that sustain an impact?


tomgregory2000 - 27/10/08 at 04:35 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Mr Whippy
ok looks fine

sightly concerened with how high the front wings are mounted going by that bracket their outside the picture!




well i wanted to make it easy to get the wheel off


tomgregory2000 - 27/10/08 at 04:37 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Johneturbo
Question is, would that sustain an impact?

if i link the 2 together inside the nose cone will that class it a sturucal? im not to clued up on this stuff


oliwb - 27/10/08 at 05:44 PM

Why not just file down the sharp edges anyway? Any inspector in the country is probably going to check anyway! I think you only really get away with it is if you had welded tubes on to the chassis that covered the area...There is a photo of someone who did this on the site somewhere.....Oli.


wicket - 27/10/08 at 05:49 PM

IMHO that's not structurally strong enough to exempt the area behind from testing.

It's not that difficult to make the suspension area's etc SVA compliant

[Edited on 27/10/08 by wicket]


jollygreengiant - 27/10/08 at 06:15 PM

I am doing similar and hope to be sva'd about January (ish). Here are some photo's so far.

on the car
nearside indicator extension bar
nearside indicator extension bar


full width frontal
nose cone full width
nose cone full width


front quarter view
nose cone side
nose cone side


rear internal view
nose cone rear
nose cone rear


rear internal view side detail
nose cone rear side detail
nose cone rear side detail


I have mounted it through the sides on rubber grommets to protect the fibre glass and bolted it to the top lip of the nose intake hole. The cut outs just inside of the nose are there for 2 reasons, first so that I can get the electrics in and out, but also so that should I ever hit something that hard then the bar should fold/deform just inside of the noise thereby reducing the amount of damage done to the nose cone. All I have left to do on it is glue the conduit in place on the nose cone roof and then make the grille and fit it. Then the nose can be refitted to the car, IF I can prise it out of the arm chair.


Steve Lovelock - 27/10/08 at 06:18 PM

At SVA this year they didn't check behind my indicators as your original question asked. I covered the sharp edges etc anyway so I don't think it would have mattered either way.


Confused but excited. - 27/10/08 at 07:50 PM

Jolly GG
That's a novel approach.
I don't think cardboard and bubble wrap has been tried before.
Let us know how you get on.

[Edited on 27/10/08 by Confused but excited.]


jollygreengiant - 27/10/08 at 10:43 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Confused but excited.
Jolly GG
That's a novel approach.
I don't think cardboard and bubble wrap has been tried before.
Let us know how you get on.

[Edited on 27/10/08 by Confused but excited.]

Ah, the card board and bubble wrap is to go with my chipboard fuel tank.