Board logo

CBR918 Vs CBR999 Mounting Points.
DANMAN - 24/3/12 at 02:26 AM

Hi guys.

Just thinking out loud. What are the chances of the 918 and 999 having similar mounting points, in other words what are the chances of removing a 918 and replacing it with a 999 without major modifications?

This is assuming a find a bucket of money somewhere.


Andy B - 24/3/12 at 07:37 AM

CBR 893 and 919 carved have different mounts to the CBR 929/954, it changes again for the 04 to 07 blades and again for the 08 onwards
Hope that helps
Andy


DANMAN - 24/3/12 at 08:27 AM

Sounds like a bit of a turd then I'm thinking if the 919 ever went I'd replace it with an 08 Blade engine but it might be a bit of a nightmare. Any idea what sort of power the 919 engines are putting out when stroked?


mark chandler - 24/3/12 at 09:32 AM

No need to throw money into an early blade, keep completely standard apart from lockup clutch, turbo it to 6 -7 PSI for ~200bhp.

If it goes bang just swap the unit across.

918 blade is very quick on its own, just make the car as light as possible.

[Edited on 24/3/12 by mark chandler]


DANMAN - 24/3/12 at 10:10 AM

Turbo does sound like a good option as pretty well every vehicle I've owned (and own) runs forced induction. I just wasn't sure what sort of power you can push these things to without them popping and what the clutches will handle. I have purchased a Stuart Taylor which should arrive next week and havnt driven it yet but I'm already thinking about power upgrades. It weighs 470kgs and has a dynojet kit already fitted and is making around 130HP. That gives a power to weight ratio of around 280HP/tonne. My current CEC Locost has around 480HP/tonne but has been off the road for the last three years while I rebuild it. Whilst I'm sure the Stuart Taylor will out handle my current Locost and I love the idea of the sequential shifting I think I'm likely to get bored with the power. As you mention 200RWHP with a turbo will give a similar power to weight so I believe this is the path I will take if the engines can handle it. I have read about people using Volvo turbos but I'm not sure what results they have been getting. It wouldn't be an overly expensive excercise if it was a case of rejetting the carbs and upgrading the fuel pump to allow for the extra fuel flow but I imagine it would be neccessary to go to injection throttle bodies and a controller which starts to add up quickly. Is this the case or are people still using the carb set up?


mark chandler - 24/3/12 at 12:26 PM

http://www.best-guess.co.uk/westfield_turboblade/

At 200bhp you will need a lockup clutch, not hugely expensive.

Mine, converted to TB's some pictures in my archive

Description
Description


DANMAN - 24/3/12 at 10:05 PM

Thanks Mark.
That's a sweet looking dynograph, very smooth delivery and pretty much exactly what I'm looking for. I'll check out your link. What turbo did you use?