Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Longer Chassis
speedyxjs

posted on 11/3/07 at 08:49 PM Reply With Quote
Longer Chassis

Im thinking about starting my chassis in a few weeks and im a bit concerned my jag aj6 might not fit .
I was thinking about extening the engine bay (chassis rails F1, F2 and G1, G2 in the old book and BR1, 2, 8 and 9 in the new book) but keeping the front the same width.
Will i run into problems with strength or anything if i do this or has anyone else got any suggestions/advice. (using a different engine is NOT an option )

Cheers





How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 11/3/07 at 09:00 PM Reply With Quote
Hi

Draw out the book chassis on the build board.

Sit your engine/gearbox on the board.

Change to suit. That's what I did.


Paul G






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 11/3/07 at 09:09 PM Reply With Quote
That's going to be a difficult one to answer - firstly a lot depends on how far back you can set the engine (normally limited by bell housing width) so the wider the car the better. Also using a 6 weight distribution becomes a factor so you want the motor far back.

If you can get the motor far enough back then you shouldn't need to lengthen the engine bay - with my 4AGe motor theres more than enough room for 2 more cylinders in front of the motor.

I think if you lengthen the bay G1 & G2 are the weak links and will need strengthening/supporting to carry the motor - also you should duplicate member R on the other side

Have a look at papers published by Cymtrix on here at simple mods that significantly strengthen the chassis.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
James

posted on 12/3/07 at 09:05 AM Reply With Quote
If you just lengthen those tubes then your suspension mounts will change position... not necessarily a good idea!

If you don't know what you're doing with suspension design I'd be careful with this... you don't want to trash the handling after all!

HTH,
James





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses, behind the lines, in the gym and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights." - Muhammad Ali

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Volvorsport

posted on 12/3/07 at 12:47 PM Reply With Quote
have you got any measurements for the engine and box ?

the volvo 6 cylinder fits in my chassis - it does come quite far foward tho , so i can measure it and see what we come up with .





www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
speedyxjs

posted on 12/3/07 at 02:24 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Volvorsport
have you got any measurements for the engine and box ?

the volvo 6 cylinder fits in my chassis - it does come quite far foward tho , so i can measure it and see what we come up with .


Have you got any pics?





How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 12/3/07 at 05:54 PM Reply With Quote
Is the g/box a Getrag?

Paul G






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
speedyxjs

posted on 12/3/07 at 08:25 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 907
Is the g/box a Getrag?

Paul G


Yes it is .

The measurements of the engine are 34 Inch by 23 inch roughly





How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 12/3/07 at 09:13 PM Reply With Quote
Mmmm, That's a big lump.

I have a Getrag on a lotus engine.

My chassis is +4 wide. My foot wells are book so the extra 4" is in the g/box space.
By doing this the front end of the bell housing is level with the end of the foot well.
This leaves 35 1/2" ish to the front of the engine bay.
I can see now why you would want to make yours bigger.

If you don't follow this I'll take a photo.

Paul G






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
speedyxjs

posted on 12/3/07 at 09:16 PM Reply With Quote
I do follow but any pics would be great. Nothing beats visual aids .





How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mark Allanson

posted on 12/3/07 at 09:26 PM Reply With Quote
I would make the upper and lower rails of 50x25mm 16g ERW and make the H tubes 50mm shorter. A small weight increase, but a massive sag resistance added to the chassis - needed with a big tubby engine





If you can keep you head, whilst all others around you are losing theirs, you are not fully aware of the situation

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 12/3/07 at 09:46 PM Reply With Quote
I like Mark's idea.

Perhaps bolt in triangulation after fitting the engine???

Pic below shows added 4" although I did it just to move the engine back for weight reasons.

Paul G Rescued attachment lotus-pics-046-s.jpg
Rescued attachment lotus-pics-046-s.jpg







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Volvorsport

posted on 12/3/07 at 11:05 PM Reply With Quote
sundays trip to santa pod .

should be some pics of use

http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=94099





www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
andyps

posted on 12/3/07 at 11:44 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by speedyxjs
(using a different engine is NOT an option )

Cheers


Course it is an option - you should make it wider too and fit the Jag V12 in





Andy

An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 13/3/07 at 11:02 AM Reply With Quote
My main concern would be weight, much as I love Jag 6s the AJ6 engine was a heavy bit of kit.

For starters I would think 4inch wider 4inch longer + 1 (or 2) inch deeper + Cymitrics mods.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 13/3/07 at 11:05 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Mark Allanson
I would make the upper and lower rails of 50x25mm 16g ERW and make the H tubes 50mm shorter. A small weight increase, but a massive sag resistance added to the chassis - needed with a big tubby engine


Might be better to keep the H tubes book length, the extra depth will make the chassis stiffer in beam bending and give more room in the footwells.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 13/3/07 at 11:09 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by andyps
quote:
Originally posted by speedyxjs
(using a different engine is NOT an option )

Cheers


Course it is an option - you should make it wider too and fit the Jag V12 in


But real Jags have XK engines :-)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
speedyxjs

posted on 13/3/07 at 12:45 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
quote:
Originally posted by andyps
quote:
Originally posted by speedyxjs
(using a different engine is NOT an option )

Cheers


Course it is an option - you should make it wider too and fit the Jag V12 in


But real Jags have XK engines :-)


2.9 aj6 is only for SVA. She will then be upgraded to 4.0 aj16 and SUPERCHARGED

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.