Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Round vs. rectangular
oneandoneis2

posted on 1/11/06 at 11:00 AM Reply With Quote
Round vs. rectangular

I live in a second-storey flat, so I'm regrettably not in a position to build a Locost until I move home, hopefully in a year or two. So I'm using the time to try & learn as much as I can before I start building.

So, first question: The book, and all the Locost builds I've come across so far, make the chassis out of RHS. But I was under the impression that round tubes were better for spaceframes.

Is RHS used just because it's easier, or are there other important reasons too?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 1/11/06 at 11:07 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by oneandoneis2

Is RHS used just because it's easier, or are there other important reasons too?


yes, to join 2 sections at an angle requires 2 straight cuts, with tube you need to "fishmouth" them - there is a program that will print the template onto a peice of paper that you wrap round the tube and cut or you can spend £££ on the special tool..

Also flat sides make it easier to rivet on flat panels.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hammerhead

posted on 1/11/06 at 11:12 AM Reply With Quote
Follow this link

http://gtslocost.locostsites.co.uk/downloads.htm

And thank Flak Monkey for the info.

And welcome.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 1/11/06 at 11:15 AM Reply With Quote
Round tubes are lighter / stronger (or a bit of both) than square tubes. Square tubes are easier to cut and easier to weld. The choice is down to whether you want it easier to make or better to drive. It may be better to complete a RHS frame than fail to complete a round tube frame

MNR recently dropped their RHS chassis in favour of all round tube after buying a tube bending machine. It allows them fewer cuts and fewer welds per chassis. They also have a fishmouth grinder too.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cloudy

posted on 1/11/06 at 11:21 AM Reply With Quote
hole saw + pillar drill = cheap tube notcher. It's really not much harder to make. tis a pain mounting things to tube though

James

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Agriv8

posted on 1/11/06 at 11:40 AM Reply With Quote
You also need to be more accurate when drilling / rivetting floor on.

As mm each way makes life very dificult.

regards

Agriv8





Taller than your average Guy !
Management is like a tree of monkeys. - Those at the top look down and see a tree full of smiling faces. BUT Those at the bottom look up and see a tree full of a*seholes .............


View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
oneandoneis2

posted on 1/11/06 at 01:47 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for all the replies. It's as I thought, then: Technically better, but practically much harder.

Given that I've never yet even touched a MIG welder, I think I'll go with RHS. For the first one, anyway

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 1/11/06 at 02:21 PM Reply With Quote
I'd disagree....I've built many of both types.....and say "practically, a little harder"....although when it comes to compound angles round wins easy over square....

Also I'd recommend square tube rather than RHS...RHS wall thickness's are generally too thick

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
chockymonster

posted on 1/11/06 at 02:22 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Agriv8
You also need to be more accurate when drilling / rivetting floor on.

As mm each way makes life very dificult.

regards

Agriv8


Tell me about it.
Round tube is a bitch to drill too but it does look a hell of a lot better and is lighter for the same strength





PLEASE NOTE - Responses on Forum Threads may contain Sarcasm and may not be suitable for the hard of Thinking.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 1/11/06 at 02:24 PM Reply With Quote
I try and avoid drilling tube if I can....when using round I'll usually weld tabs on for attachments.....

Extra work and a pain...yes...but it looks great IMO

A few tabs can be seen on this.....




[Edited on 1/11/06 by Alan B]

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
oneandoneis2

posted on 1/11/06 at 02:44 PM Reply With Quote
Oooo, pretty

Maybe I'll just try out a few bits of both round & square tubing before I start building and see what I make of them both.

I'd prefer round, just so long as it won't cause any major problems. .

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
caber

posted on 1/11/06 at 09:41 PM Reply With Quote
Wish i had thought more about this before I started. I thought square tube would be generally easier to do, In retrospect the compound angles are a real pain and fishmouthing with a pillar drill and hole saw is a lot easier than it sounds.

I will deffinitely try round tube for the next build!

Caber

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
kb58

posted on 2/11/06 at 04:43 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by caber
Wish i had thought more about this before I started. I thought square tube would be generally easier to do, In retrospect the compound angles are a real pain and fishmouthing with a pillar drill and hole saw is a lot easier than it sounds.

I will deffinitely try round tube for the next build!

Caber


My findings exactly, round tubes everywhere - except where panels attach - then square is better.

Use both where they excel.

[Edited on 11/2/06 by kb58]





Mid-engine Locost - http://www.midlana.com
And the book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/midlana/paperback/product-21330662.html
Kimini - a tube-frame, carbon shell, Honda Prelude VTEC mid-engine Mini: http://www.kimini.com
And its book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/kimini-how-to-design-and-build-a-mid-engine-sports-car-from-scratch/paperback/product-4858803.html

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
3GEComponents

posted on 3/11/06 at 03:49 PM Reply With Quote
I purchased one of these from the States, only $199, about £100, not too dear for a tool. It does do fantastic joints and the cutters are cheap.

It's a HSN 500 notcher, from a company called protool or something like it. Rescued attachment hsn500-full.jpeg
Rescued attachment hsn500-full.jpeg

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 3/11/06 at 04:17 PM Reply With Quote
Yup...that's the one I have too....works very well.......Protool do some good stuff, I got my bender off them too.....
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
lexi

posted on 6/11/06 at 05:20 PM Reply With Quote
I need convincing that 25mm round is stronger than square in the same gauge............especially where torsional rigidity is concerned.
Alex

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 7/11/06 at 03:14 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by lexi
I need convincing that 25mm round is stronger than square in the same gauge............especially where torsional rigidity is concerned.



I don't it will be, but then the 25 mm square will weigh more. So the get same strenht as 25 mm square the roud tube would be a bit bigger say 27 mm but still lighter than 27 mm sauqre - if that makes sense.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 7/11/06 at 05:22 PM Reply With Quote
Search for old posts.

I posted a load of maths about 7 or 8 months back with all the comparisons in, and have done on occasions before this too. I cant be arsed to do the maths again!

David





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jlparsons

posted on 15/1/07 at 12:27 AM Reply With Quote
From what my old man said, the best rule of thumb is take any given tube, dip it in fairy liquid and blow a half bubble out the end. The steepness of the wall of the bubble is proportional to the addition that part of the tube wall adds to the stiffness of the member.
Or something like that. Bloody engineers.

I do remember the bit I was supposed to take away though - round's stiffer torsionally than square or rectangular tube.





Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental. Some assembly required. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during shipment. Use only as directed. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Subject to approval, terms and conditions apply. Apply only to affected area. For recreational use only. All models over 18 years of age. No user-serviceable parts inside. Subject to change. As seen on TV. One size fits all. May contain nuts. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Edited for television. Keep cool; process promptly.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.