graememk
|
| posted on 9/2/06 at 10:12 PM |
|
|
is something missing ?
should there be a top bar here is something missing ?
 
Description
|
|
|
|
|
tri
|
| posted on 9/2/06 at 10:21 PM |
|
|
if your building an MK Indy then thats what ours is like i think (could be wrong) its just to suport the rear panel
Tri
|
|
|
kev R1
|
| posted on 9/2/06 at 10:21 PM |
|
|
no i thought that with mine. put the rear on and you get all the strength from the panel once you rivet it on!kev
|
|
|
Avoneer
|
| posted on 9/2/06 at 10:31 PM |
|
|
Rear panel ???
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
|
|
graememk
|
| posted on 9/2/06 at 10:34 PM |
|
|
many thanks, wasnt sure if something should be there
[Edited on 9/2/06 by graememk]
|
|
|
indykid
|
| posted on 11/2/06 at 06:33 PM |
|
|
personally, i'd cut it off on both sides if you haven't already found that out today.
it doesn't support anything, and the back panel aligns itself according to the side panels.
i had to bend mine to enable the rear panel to even sit roughly where it should be. they must be a flawed design, as the new chassis have a flat tab
there instead, that the ineer flange of the back panel sits on.
hth
tom
|
|
|
%20(WinCE).JPG)
