Board logo

chassis design
hellbent345 - 10/7/08 at 09:40 PM

finally got round to posting up my solidworks designs of my chassis! i changed a lot! can anybody see any glaring mistakes? i prefer twin rollbars so had to change the back portion to support that, is the redesign sufficiently strong? alos added a trany tunnel similar to a westfield to accomodate mt75 box (the westy design i used incorporated the mt75) also a diagonal rear crossbar for rear impact protection as i had to widen the ditance between the rear vertical tubes, and i few other mod i cant remeber, what do u all think? red is added, blue is modified, yellow is modified from the book measurements simply to fit, and green is stuff i need to change later
thanks
al





big_wasa - 10/7/08 at 09:51 PM

just an idea but I like a second rail the full width of the car for the roll bar mounts ect


blakep82 - 10/7/08 at 09:52 PM

i'm not sure if its worth some kind of triangulation under the seats? i forgot what the book chassis' like. just seems the floor of the chassis is very square


CaptainJosh - 10/7/08 at 09:57 PM

quote:
Originally posted by big_wasa
just an idea but I like a second rail the full width of the car for the roll bar mounts ect


I second that!


indykid - 10/7/08 at 10:01 PM

i'd run the back braces for the roll hoops down to the back corners of the chassis onto a plate in the rounded corner.

also i'd swap the top braces in the engine bay for y braces running to the top of the fu tubes. as they are, they do very little as the top side rail will offer no support.


hellbent345 - 10/7/08 at 10:09 PM

yeh the second rail idea is a good one i was thinking that the chassis plate were a little flimsy! triangulationwise i dont know what is needed both the book chassis i was looking at and the westfield drawings dont have any triangulation under the seats but i agree it would seem like it needs it there... good idea about bringing the stays down to the bottom, only problem i could think of is would the angle then be a little shallow-also the bars might then encroach on the fuel tank...? what do you mean about y braces?


big_wasa - 10/7/08 at 10:15 PM

Not a Y brace but better than the short braces you have.

The top two braces that run from your bulk head to part way down the top rails.


big_wasa - 10/7/08 at 10:22 PM

front rack mounts will need more bracing aswell


andrew-theasby - 10/7/08 at 10:24 PM

If i had some pictures id post them, but ive just done my roll bar exactly as the suggestions, seems plenty strong enough. Mine bolts in, and your right it does foul the fuel tank but i just cut two scallops out of it and welded plates back in to clear it. With your welded in rollbar, can you actually get a fuel tank into position? I didnt like the idea of going back to the top rail without putting more triangulation in (looking sideways on the car) from roll bar base straight back to top rail where the rear stay mounts to stop it all collapsing backwards in an accident, but then that would serverely restrict the size of tank you could get in.


indykid - 10/7/08 at 10:55 PM

this is what i mean.

tom Rescued attachment y brace.jpg
Rescued attachment y brace.jpg


tomblyth - 11/7/08 at 05:36 AM

my mk does'nt have all that extra triangulation!
(http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/photos.php?action=showphoto&photo=2DSC00111.JPG)
I dont think it needs it , if you keep adding bars and all that extra weight you might as well drive an off the shelf car and if weight is not an issue and your after better crash protection drive one of these (http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/photos.php?action=showphoto&photo=well%20build%20will%20survive%20a%20crash.jpg)
i hear there good in an impact but heavy on fuel.


Ivan - 11/7/08 at 07:43 AM

^^^ I agree - however if you are going this route I would add additional triangulation for the Roll Bar bracing as shown in yellow below.

Of course if the chassis is fully braced then you might get away with 19mm steel instead of 25mm - however you would need to get a profesional FEA done to check


Description
Description


hellbent345 - 11/7/08 at 08:32 AM

thanks for the ideas, what is the average weight of a chassis, does anyone know? ive done an analysis on what ive got so far and it wil weigh around 100kg (103) is that hefty? also that diagonal bracing for the rollbar is a good idea i may well add that , the y bracing looks interesting, but ill run an fea to see what tubing i can get down to safely in places to lighten er up, and see if that will really make much of an impact (the top of the engine bay as it is, is almost exactly the same as the top of a westfield bay)


indykid - 11/7/08 at 09:43 AM

search for posts by cymtriks on fea. liam also did some fea on his chassis and both came to the asme conclusion. the R tube is very important to torsional rigidity of the chassis.

following a manufacturer's example doesn't neccesarily mean it's correct. an MK is missing all sorts of tubes in the engine bay that would probably help.

tom


scootz - 11/7/08 at 11:03 AM

Are there any suppliers who offer heavy guage roll hoops, or do you have to commission your own?


hellbent345 - 11/7/08 at 12:31 PM

im going to have to get them made i think as id rather know that my head isnt going to become closely aquainted with the ground if the worst happens! so ill be getting in touch with some people and getting it done 1 off! spensiveeee


Cobra289 - 13/7/08 at 06:24 PM

hellbent345

Well done!
It looks pretty nice in SW.
I have done a comparable design in SW and the weight [without the foot well,plates] is 66Kg.
How much is yours?

Watch out for the suspension components, that will make or kill your car.
Regards,
Cobra289


MakeEverything - 1/8/08 at 09:39 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
thanks for the ideas, what is the average weight of a chassis, does anyone know? ive done an analysis on what ive got so far and it wil weigh around 100kg (103) is that hefty? also that diagonal bracing for the rollbar is a good idea i may well add that , the y bracing looks interesting, but ill run an fea to see what tubing i can get down to safely in places to lighten er up, and see if that will really make much of an impact (the top of the engine bay as it is, is almost exactly the same as the top of a westfield bay)


If you cant lift it off the ground completely with one arm, by standing in the middle, then its too heavy. Looking at the above discussions, triangulation isnt necessary inder the seat, as the "Squares" wont flex or become trapezoid shapes. The geometry on the car is in a different plane ie. Forwards and sideways, or in a twisting motion. Triangulation here wont stop twist. Dont underestimate the strength of 8guage 25mm box, or indeed a descent weld.


hellbent345 - 14/8/08 at 09:43 AM

8 guage :O! ive done a bit more on the design taking quite few cues from the caterham rs (V8) the chassis weighs a bit over 100kg cobra, i think i shelled all the members but i cant be sure so thick members may be part of the cause! i recon if i lifted with my knees i could prob lift up 100kg with one hand but only for a split second, does that count? ill post up the pics of the design, itll be mainly bodywork im fraid!
al


hellbent345 - 14/8/08 at 09:50 AM





Cobra289 - 14/8/08 at 09:46 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
[img]

Nice surface work.
I am fighting with the nose cone.
Regards,
Cobra289


Liam - 15/8/08 at 11:27 AM

I had a go at a nosecone ages ago. See here...

http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=37702

It was really just to learn a bit about using the 3D surface features with a minimal number of profile sketches. As such, it's dimensionally reasonable but certainly not an 'elegant' use of Solidworks. I had all sorts of problems thickening to solids and it's ended up with over 30 unmerged solid bodies etc etc. Anyway it served its purpose and you can get it at that link.

I guess the 'proper' accurate way to do it would be painstakingly measuring up the real thing and building up cross section profiles, say every inch, the lofting between them, shelling, trimming etc - i.e. the computer version of building a wooden mould for replica bodywork. Or using a package more geared for abstract 3D shapes.

Liam


hellbent345 - 15/8/08 at 10:32 PM

yup that would be the way to do it, i lofted in rathr larger stages with guide curves and it didnt give me exactly what i wanted, but near enough to look alright, that linky was good when im next on my cad computer ill download them iles, i have my nosecone file cobra if u want it? its rather rough but ur welcome if u want it (2008 file, or parasolid) im still at the stage of not knowing how front uprights work so i cant design them, i know about the cortina upright part, but i dont know how the wheel then bolts onto the shaft, plus people say shaft through bearing is beter than some other method but i dunno whats up! anyone got an exploded drawing of a fully assembled front upright, bearing hubs and all? thanks for kind words!
alan


Cobra289 - 17/8/08 at 01:13 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
yup that would be the way to do it, i lofted in rathr larger stages with guide curves and it didnt give me exactly what i wanted, but near enough to look alright, that linky was good when im next on my cad computer ill download them iles, i have my nosecone file cobra if u want it? its rather rough but ur welcome if u want it (2008 file, or parasolid) im still at the stage of not knowing how front uprights work so i cant design them, i know about the cortina upright part, but i dont know how the wheel then bolts onto the shaft, plus people say shaft through bearing is beter than some other method but i dunno whats up! anyone got an exploded drawing of a fully assembled front upright, bearing hubs and all? thanks for kind words!
alan

It would be nice to get the nosecone. I use SW2007 I prefer to have as 2007 but probably would be impossible, a parsolid would be OK.
Our Locost design has the dimensions equivalent to the Chris Gibs [Haynes] book and I did try the cone of the mentioned thread but that cone shims to be for an standard chassis.
Check my Nosecone without any measured dimension but just an space match.
At the second picture you can see the downloaded nosecone that differs a lot.





Regards,
Cobra289

Regards,
Cobra289


Doug68 - 17/8/08 at 02:05 PM

Why do people always want to do this?

wouldn't it be easier just to remake the tie road the right length? Rescued attachment Untitled-1.jpg
Rescued attachment Untitled-1.jpg


Cobra289 - 17/8/08 at 02:24 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Doug68
Why do people always want to do this?

wouldn't it be easier just to remake the tie road the right length?


I will explain why.

1) Locost spirit.
2) Use of donor car parts. (sierra steering rack)
3) Availability at your resident area.
4) Fitments with the upright design.

At the other hand you are right a single piece is always better and simple.

I would be happy to get shop address that deliver the tie-rods on the requested length. [Sierra steering rack]

Regards,
Cobra289


Doug68 - 18/8/08 at 07:17 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Doug68
Why do people always want to do this?

wouldn't it be easier just to remake the tie road the right length?


Sorry stupid question is was late


hellbent345 - 19/8/08 at 09:16 PM

i would say that mine is the same as yours chap, and i just did mine to fit a bonnet that i just did so that it all looked right! im fiberglassing it all myself anyway, but i need the sw drg to get dims for laser cutting mdf for the buck! you are still welcome to it if you desire! also what would be reqd to make a tie bar rather than an extension out of interest

alan


hellbent345 - 19/8/08 at 09:44 PM

just an update on the build, ive now finished my build table and put on all the wooden blocks! and got my steel welding next woop!


the chassis bench


the steel!


Cobra289 - 19/8/08 at 09:53 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
i would say that mine is the same as yours chap, and i just did mine to fit a bonnet that i just did so that it all looked right! im fiberglassing it all myself anyway, but i need the sw drg to get dims for laser cutting mdf for the buck! you are still welcome to it if you desire! also what would be reqd to make a tie bar rather than an extension out of interest
alan


Hi Alan,
Thanks for the offer, Today I have done some work, inspired on pictures, I think that I did mange to get a nice shape.
I see that you go the hard way, build one your self. I hope that my chassis accept some standard nosecones [MK or equivalent]

I have reduces the sketches to the minimum and make a separate apex surface.
So there are only 4 surfaces [top, U bottom, left and right apex] after that I did "Knit" all the surfaces and "Thicken" to nosecone.
Thicken is a problem when the radius is to small, but I goat it.

Probably my expression Tie-bar was incorrect, we are talking here about the "Steering-rod' I need an extension [like most people] to get the right length.

You can buy new steering-rods for the Sierra steering-rack but not with the right length.
Welding is a forbidding area, so the best is to have an extension.



Regards,
Carlos [Cobra289]

PS
Nice table! I will try to have the tubes "Laser Cut"


hellbent345 - 19/8/08 at 09:57 PM

oh and i gave one of the calipers a lick of paint (poor quality paint, dont buy from waxacar off ebay people, it takes about a year to dry fully!) what thinks you?


alan


Cobra289 - 19/8/08 at 10:04 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
oh and i gave one of the calipers a lick of paint (poor quality paint, dont buy from waxacar off ebay people, it takes about a year to dry fully!) what thinks you?


alan


Hi,
I have had the same problem with a good brand aerosol.
It was red and it was for the brake caliper of my Cobra, I can say that after waiting for a week I could install it without picking the paint. But till today [3 years] that paint is in very good condition.
It was a heat resistant paint.

Regards,
Cobra289


hellbent345 - 19/8/08 at 10:05 PM

Thanks cobra!
theres no way to make it (the steering extensions) from one piece?
i still havent done the fea on the chassis so i cant go much further until im absolutely sure that it will be stiff enough for my purposes and more importantly survive a rollover situation!
Nice surface work on your nosecone, it looks a lot better than mine now, i think i should give surfaces a fair try now, as ive been using loft and shell up to now, and its been giving..... mixed results lol

about the paint, its hard now, but i can still pick it off with a fingernail dunno if thats my fault or the paints! maybe i should have put it in an oven? its supposedly heat resistant as well, i dont know if its therefore designed to be applied on the car, then the heat of the brakes working cures it...? anyway i wasnt happy with thier communication so i still wouldnt recommend

[Edited on 19/8/08 by hellbent345]


Cobra289 - 19/8/08 at 10:06 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Cobra289
quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
oh and i gave one of the calipers a lick of paint (poor quality paint, dont buy from waxacar off ebay people, it takes about a year to dry fully!) what thinks you?


alan


Hi,
I have had the same problem with a good brand aerosol.
It was red and it was for the brake caliper of my Cobra, I can say that after waiting for a week I could install it without picking the paint. But till today [3 years] that paint remains in very good condition.
It was a heat resistant paint.

Regards,
Cobra289


Cobra289 - 19/8/08 at 10:32 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
Thanks cobra!
theres no way to make it (the steering extensions) from one piece?
i still havent done the fea on the chassis so i cant go much further until im absolutely sure that it will be stiff enough for my purposes and more importantly survive a rollover situation!
Nice surface work on your nosecone, it looks a lot better than mine now, i think i should give surfaces a fair try now, as ive been using loft and shell up to now, and its been giving..... mixed results lol

about the paint, its hard now, but i can still pick it off with a fingernail dunno if thats my fault or the paints! maybe i should have put it in an oven? its supposedly heat resistant as well, i dont know if its therefore designed to be applied on the car, then the heat of the brakes working cures it...? anyway i wasnt happy with thier communication so i still wouldnt recommend

[Edited on 19/8/08 by hellbent345]


I am shore that you can find a shop in the UK that will make a set of steering rods to your desired length, the problem here is always, how much it cost.
I haven't dig on the item yet.

In my opinion a "FEA" is not necessary, there is a lot of literature [Thesis] that describes where to make the chassis stronger if it is necessary.

Some people have mentioned to change the steel plates at the roll-bar for a dual tube.
I can say that this was my first solution a wile ago and I was surprise that people come to the same solutions.
The dual tube will reduce [a lot] the weight compared to the steel plates.

Regards,
Cobra289

[Edited on 19/8/08 by Cobra289]


hellbent345 - 20/8/08 at 09:55 AM

if i was to change the plates for that second rail, would i have to keep the plates to attach the rollbar to? i want to add it anyway i think its a good idea, but i dont know if there would be any reduction in weight, only an addition..?


Cobra289 - 20/8/08 at 10:24 AM

quote:
Originally posted by hellbent345
if i was to change the plates for that second rail, would i have to keep the plates to attach the rollbar to? i want to add it anyway i think its a good idea, but i dont know if there would be any reduction in weight, only an addition..?

A very thing top plate of max. 2 mm is OK to have a flat surface. Forget the vertical ones, don't need it, just connect the pipes against the new section [rail].
For the attachment of the roll-bar you can drill through the tube [require a trust washer].
In my case the hole pattern was changed for a triangle instead of the clasic square.
At the central part of your dual roll-bar you can do the same way to solve.
Now take the weight of all the plates and compare to the new solution and you will see that you have a significant weight reduction.

Watch out and remember that you need to introduce the differential. Make a plan how to do it and keep to that plan when you introduce diagonals.

Regards,
Cobra289


hellbent345 - 2/9/08 at 05:05 PM

update on progress, ive made a good start of getting the chassis welded up, got a few piccies here





quality of some of the tack welds (co2 btw)



i had a bit of a fire


Cobra289 - 2/9/08 at 05:18 PM

Nice job,
Looks pretty! be careful and keep some safety stuff around the work area, a large blanket helps a lot.

If you remember and have the time can you please pass the file of the box?

Best regards,
Cobra289

[Edited on 2/9/08 by Cobra289]


Cobra289 - 2/9/08 at 05:19 PM

Nice job,
Looks pretty! be careful and keep some safety stuff around the work area, a large blanket helps a lot.

If you remember and have the time, can you please pass the file of the box?

Best regards,
Cobra289


Mave - 3/9/08 at 06:44 AM

About the steering arm extensions; on a Dax Rush they seem to consist of welded parts: the weld is just beneath the thick section in this picture.



Cobra289 - 3/9/08 at 10:13 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Mave
About the steering arm extensions; on a Dax Rush they seem to consist of welded parts: the weld is just beneath the thick section in this picture.





Someone told me that this is a SVA requirement, "No welds" at the track rods.
I can understand why.
But please check it, because I can't confirm that this is a rule, it was just a comment for form a person that I don't know very well.

Probably others will confirm or denay the statement.

Best regards,
Cobra289


andy188 - 3/9/08 at 03:53 PM

Hi, im new to this, have been using this site during my build, suggest you add some tubes in front sections for wishbones mounting strength as has been suggested previously (studies done by uni)


andy188 - 3/9/08 at 03:54 PM

Hi, im new to this, have been using this site during my build, suggest you add some tubes in front sections for wishbones mounting strength as has been suggested previously (studies done by uni)


hellbent345 - 5/9/08 at 12:45 PM

you have email cobra sorry it took so long chap!
can you confirm what you mean about the wishbone strengthening andy? is that the y bars? ill put pics up later but i think ive decided to put y struts in, but have the long peice running from the front to the v's at the back removable, a bit like a strut brace but at 90 degrees obviously, so there is more room to get the engine in and out if need be what do people think?


andy188 - 16/9/08 at 04:26 PM

if you search using cymtriks, he has drawings etc for the chassis mods, i have added all that he has suggested, & some extra ones for roll cage mounting posns, as i have incorperated a full cage on mine.


chrisg - 16/9/08 at 05:24 PM

Any welded component in the steering arms is an automatic SVA (and MOT) failure, which is why everyone uses screwed extensions and locknuts. This is the equivalentof the track rod/track rod end connection.

That steering arm may be on a Dax, but it isn't how Dax extend thelrs.

Cheers

Chris


hellbent345 - 15/11/08 at 11:44 AM

getting on with my build, ive fully welded most of the chassis now, just got a few worries about the bleedin size of my engine! but here are the pics









Liam - 15/11/08 at 09:30 PM

Looking good!

Awww that little engine looks tiny in there! No excuse for not going for the proper engine bay 'R' tubes - you know it makes sense!

Liam


hellbent345 - 16/11/08 at 09:28 PM

haha yeh, that baby is so monsterous im going to get it all fitted and then put removable y tubes in a think! otherwise im never gonna fit anything in i dont think!