Board logo

Stainless Chassis
loggyboy - 1/11/09 at 10:12 PM

Im sure its been discussed to death, but what would be the cost implications be and would a manufactuer (MK, Raw, etc) ever consider making one?


snapper - 1/11/09 at 10:14 PM

Stainless is to brittle for a chassis


madteg - 1/11/09 at 10:22 PM

What a load of cr-p mine is now3 years old done 7000 miles five track days one full day at zolder. Also i am putting 320 BHP through the back wheels. Rescued attachment chassis in kitchen.jpg
Rescued attachment chassis in kitchen.jpg


scootz - 1/11/09 at 10:23 PM

quote:
Originally posted by snapper
Stainless is to brittle for a chassis


Why?

My Quantum Xtreme has a stainless chassis and is perfectly fine.


SeaBass - 1/11/09 at 10:23 PM

Yeah - Are we not confusing aluminium with stainless here???


ashg - 1/11/09 at 10:29 PM

you can use ali too but the material thickness would make it pointless as a weight saving exercise


SeaBass - 1/11/09 at 10:39 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ashg
you can use ali too but the material thickness would make it pointless as a weight saving exercise


Oh please... Leave Aluminium out just for once.


omega0684 - 1/11/09 at 10:44 PM

isn't stainless heavier and normal steel? so wouldn't it be a heavier chassis anyway?


iank - 1/11/09 at 10:52 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ashg
you can use ali too but the material thickness would make it pointless as a weight saving exercise


Not as a spaceframe you can't even if you used solid bar it would crack due to the welds annealing the stuff. See 907's post in this thread
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=120823

907 has built a stainless chassis, but agrees that stainless is prone to cracking compared to mild steel. You need to be very careful picking your grade, and should TIG weld it rather than MIG (much better for regular chassis as well as you don't suffer the cold start problems)
Again see his post in this thread detailing this issues and advice.
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=57683


Dingz - 1/11/09 at 10:56 PM

Kev, you need a bigger garage or move the tele!


loggyboy - 1/11/09 at 11:23 PM

Well I wouldnt be welding or making it myself, I just wondered if its even worth asking a company to do, from a cost and a feasability perspective.


Humbug - 2/11/09 at 07:21 AM

Robin Hood can do you a stainless (monocoque) chassis ready made


iank - 2/11/09 at 07:34 AM

quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
Well I wouldnt be welding or making it myself, I just wondered if its even worth asking a company to do, from a cost and a feasability perspective.


I'd talk to 907 personally if I were interested in the idea.


designer - 2/11/09 at 08:17 AM

The Robin Hood 2B Superspec has a stainless chassis


MikeRJ - 2/11/09 at 08:30 AM

quote:
Originally posted by designer
The Robin Hood 2B Superspec has a stainless chassis


Low grade stainless though (exhaust tubing), it still seems to get surface rust if not painted.


Bluemoon - 2/11/09 at 09:20 AM

2nd talking to 907, not sure that any manufacturer has the experience to make you a good S/S chassis. If corrosion is you issue I would consider normal chassis then hot-zinc spray it (equivalent to dip galvanization but without the heat, not much more expensive than powder coating, but you will probably want to paint it after).

Dan

[Edited on 2/11/09 by Bluemoon]


scootz - 2/11/09 at 09:35 AM

quote:
Originally posted by SeaBass
quote:
Originally posted by ashg
you can use ali too but the material thickness would make it pointless as a weight saving exercise


Oh please... Leave Aluminium out just for once.


Lol... ashg - perhaps you should change your name to ali-g


mangogrooveworkshop - 2/11/09 at 11:19 AM

I recently had to repair a crack in a caterham so steel is no better......
Think its cost , design, and quality of the welding that will make or break a chassis.
As for the weight issue its the drivers that could loose some weight........lol


mangogrooveworkshop - 2/11/09 at 11:46 AM

I recently had to repair a crack in a caterham so steel is no better......
Think its cost , design, and quality of the welding that will make or break a chassis.
As for the weight issue its the drivers that could loose some weight........lol


907 - 2/11/09 at 11:57 AM

Hi All.


Just thought I'd add a bit of info regarding weight.

A cubic metre of mild steel weighs 7752 kgs.
A cubic metre of stainless, depending on the grade, is around 7900 kgs.

So that's about a 2% weight gain for stainless.



This is of course off set to a small degree by the lack of paint.


Cheers
Paul G


Uryen - 2/11/09 at 11:58 AM

quote:
Originally posted by madteg
What a load of cr-p mine is now3 years old done 7000 miles five track days one full day at zolder. Also i am putting 320 BHP through the back wheels.


My goodness your wife must love you alot to let you put that in the kitchen.

I am not allowed to bring anything inside. But I am given the garage as my domain.


britishtrident - 2/11/09 at 12:10 PM

quote:
Originally posted by mangogrooveworkshop
I recently had to repair a crack in a caterham so steel is no better......
Think its cost , design, and quality of the welding that will make or break a chassis.
As for the weight issue its the drivers that could loose some weight........lol


Caterham's used 1.2 mm wall thickness --- a hangover from the original Lotus Seven don't know if they still do.


britishtrident - 2/11/09 at 12:15 PM

With stainless you would really have to know what you are doing with material grades and using the correct filler wire.

The stuff Robin Hood use is sometimes called stainless iron ---- ie it isn't really intended as a structural material,


hughpinder - 2/11/09 at 03:21 PM

I have heard of problems with cracking in stainless - due to the change in composition of the steel in the heat affected zone near the weld, so its quite dependant on the grade. I don't really know if this is significant though- it will depend on the grade of SS.
Stainless has lower thermal conductivity (third to half) mild steel and about 30% higher thermal expansion, so distortion is much higher.
The tensile strengths of the various grades of stainless varies a lot, so its difficult to say if the chassis would have to be heavier or lighter!
You need to treat (passivate) the weld to get the best corrosion resistance.
Stainless, when it tears, tends to produce razor edges compared to mild steel - ask anyone who's drilled it, then carelessly brushed the swarf away with their hand.
It will be harder to modify/tack on brackets etc afterwards as there are less people around who are set up to weld stainless.
If you drill and tap it, be aware than bolts screwed into stainless threads can bind horribly.
Stainless work hardens, so if you part flexes it will end up more likely to fail - this is only going to be a problem if you are close to the limit though.
Regards
Hugh


snapper - 2/11/09 at 06:14 PM

quote:

What a load of cr-p mine is now3 years old done 7000 miles five track days one full day at zolder. Also i am putting 320 BHP through the back wheels.



So madteg.... my comments arn't complete crap then....

Yes stainless is used by Robin Hood, yest the stainless monocoques use a softer steel but it still cracks, the 2b's with there tube chassis don't crack as a rule....

Stainless in its purer forms cracks...

To make a stainless chassis it needs the right stainless and correctly welded.

It might crack though.