Alan M
|
 posted on 28/4/10 at 09:25 AM |
|
|
Photo upload
Am I being thick or is the photo upload function not working?
|
|
|
|
|
iank
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 09:28 AM |
|
|
It fails to upload if the files are too big or have 'funny' characters in the name.
Best to only use alphanumerics and _ in the filenames (along with the dot for the extension obviously).
It complains if it doesn't like/understand the extension, which is a bit of a pain as uploading pdfs and cad files would be useful
occasionally.
[Edited on 28/4/10 by iank]
--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous
|
|
|
cd.thomson
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 09:38 AM |
|
|
best to only use off-site image hosting.
http://picasaweb.google.com
Craig
|
|
|
Alan M
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 09:56 AM |
|
|
Nope it's not that. I resized to 450 x 337 pixels, it's only 62kb and it is only called exhaust
|
|
|
iank
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 10:16 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Alan M
Nope it's not that. I resized to 450 x 337 pixels, it's only 62kb and it is only called exhaust
Just checked it's worked fine for me, though strangely it's not been stuck on the end of the list but in the middle.
Test
 
Description
Is your picture called "exhaust", or "exhaust.jpg" I wonder if the unique name mangler is broken. Try putting a random number in
the name.
[Edited on 28/4/10 by iank]
--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous
|
|
|
coozer
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 10:33 AM |
|
|
I use photobucket a fair bit and it resizes the pics to suit the website.
Steve
1972 V8 Jago
1980 Z750
|
|
|
ChrisW
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 11:24 AM |
|
|
It could well be broken. I'm working on a vastly improved photo module.
Chris
|
|
|
BenB
|
| posted on 28/4/10 at 04:23 PM |
|
|
otherwise could it be that someone already has one in the archive called that?
|
|
|
